Literature DB >> 17904327

Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically.

Máire O'Donnell1, Steinar Hunskaar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making change depending on the context and factors associated with preferences.
METHODS: A national telephone survey of 1000 randomly selected Norwegian women aged 18 years or over using the Control Preferences Scale (CPS) to assess preferences.
RESULTS: More women preferred an active role when asked about hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and urinary incontinence (UI) treatment decision-making specifically than when asked a question about preferences for involvement when generally making treatment decisions. Higher education and very good general health were significantly associated with preferring an active role in HRT and UI treatment decision-making. A negative attitude towards HRT was also significantly associated with preferring an active role when considering HRT. Women with higher educational levels were significantly more likely to choose an option from the CPS that indicated a preference for wanting more involvement in HRT decision-making compared to treatment decision-making generally.
CONCLUSIONS: Women's preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making change depending on the context as do factors associated with role preferences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care professionals need to be aware that patients' preferences may change depending on the context of the treatment decision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17904327     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  9 in total

1.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nora B Henrikson; B Joyce Davison; Donna L Berry
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

3.  Treatment decision-making and information-seeking preferences in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Vivian W Sung; Christina A Raker; Deborah L Myers; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anne W Ekdahl; Lars Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Too complex and time-consuming to fit in! Physicians' experiences of elderly patients and their participation in medical decision making: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl; Ingrid Hellström; Lars Andersson; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Preferences Regarding Shared Decision-Making in Japanese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.

Authors:  Ryuji Morishige; Hiroshi Nakajima; Kazutake Yoshizawa; Jörg Mahlich; Rosarin Sruamsiri
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Theory-based strategies for enhancing the impact and usage of digital health behaviour change interventions: A review.

Authors:  Leanne G Morrison
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2015-07-17

8.  Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.

Authors:  A H Pieterse; M C M Baas-Thijssen; C A M Marijnen; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Shared Decision-Making in Patients With Prostate Cancer in Japan: Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions.

Authors:  Ulrike Schaede; Jörg Mahlich; Masahiko Nakayama; Hisanori Kobayashi; Yuriko Takahashi; Katsuhiko Saito; Hiroji Uemura; Masayuki Tokumitsu; Kazutake Yoshizawa
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-04-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.