Literature DB >> 33844104

Examining the Factors that Contribute to Non-Monotonic Growth of the [Formula: see text] Otoacoustic Emission in Humans.

Mackenzie L Mills1, Yi Shen1,2, Robert H Withnell3.   

Abstract

Cubic distortion product otoacoustic emission input-output functions in humans show a complex pattern of growth. To further investigate the growth of the [Formula: see text] otoacoustic emission, magnitude and phase input-output functions were obtained from human subjects using a range of stimulus levels, frequencies, and frequency ratios. Three factors related to cochlear nonlinearity may produce non-monotonic input-output functions: a two-component interaction, an operating point shift, and two-tone suppression. To complement data interpretation, a local model of distortion product otoacoustic emission generation was fit to the magnitude spectrum of the averaged ear canal sound pressure recording to quantify operating point shift. Results obtained are consistent with non-monotonic growth occurring primarily as a result of two-tone suppression and/or a two-component interaction. These two mechanisms are expected to operate at different stimulus levels, with different signature magnitude and phase patterns, and are unlikely to overlap in producing non-monotonic growth. An operating point shift was suggested in three cases. These results support multiple factors contributing to the complexity of growth of the [Formula: see text] otoacoustic emission in humans and highlight the importance of looking at phase in addition to magnitude when interpreting distortion product otoacoustic emission growth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  input–output; operating point; suppression; two-component

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844104      PMCID: PMC8110667          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00788-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  26 in total

1.  Distortion-product source unmixing: a test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation.

Authors:  R Kalluri; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure.

Authors:  Sumitrajit Dhar; Carrick L Talmadge; Glenis R Long; Arnold Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Investigating the wave-fixed and place-fixed origins of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission within a micromechanical cochlear model.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Young; Stephen J Elliott; Ben Lineton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acetylcholine, outer hair cell electromotility, and the cochlear amplifier.

Authors:  P Dallos; D Z He; X Lin; I Sziklai; S Mehta; B N Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  G Zweig; C A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Automatic monitoring of mechano-electrical transduction in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  R Patuzzi; A Moleirinho
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression.

Authors:  C D Geisler; G K Yates; R B Patuzzi; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Distributed sources as a cause of abrupt amplitude decrease in cubic distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at high stimulus intensities.

Authors:  Václav Vencovský; Aleš Vetešník; Ernst Dalhoff; Anthony W Gummer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Ping Luo; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.