Literature DB >> 17902334

Part-time versus full-time retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial.

Daljit S Gill1, Farhad B Naini, Allan Jones, Christopher J Tredwin.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare part-time and full-time Essix-type retainer wear regimens following fixed appliance treatment, with respect to dental alignment and occlusal changes.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 60 patients were randomly allocated to either full-time or part-time Essix retainer wear following fixed appliance therapy. Study casts were taken before treatment, at debonding, and 6 months following debonding. Little's irregularity index, the intercanine width, intermolar width, overjet, and overbite were measured blindly on both the maxillary and mandibular casts.
RESULTS: Both groups showed pretreatment equivalence for start age, duration of fixed appliance treatment, Little's index, intercanine width, intermolar width, overjet, and overbite. The number of patients completing the trial was 29 (1 dropout) in the part-time group and 28 in the full-time group (2 dropouts). There was a significant reduction in both the maxillary and mandibular Little's index and mandibular intermolar width in both groups during active treatment. There was a significant reduction in overjet and overbite in only the part-time retention group during fixed appliance treatment. Between debonding and 6 months after debonding, there was no significant change in any of the intra- or intergroup study cast measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: Night-time-only Essix retainer wear may be an acceptable retention regimen following the use of fixed appliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17902334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthod        ISSN: 1530-5678


  12 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  Retention in orthodontics.

Authors:  C D Johnston; S J Littlewood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  One-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers.

Authors:  Asma Ashari; Lew Xian; Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed; Rohaya Megat Abdul Wahab; Yeoh Chiew Kit; Malathi Deva Tata; Sindhu Sinnasamy; Elavarasi Kuppusamy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of relapse with thermoplastic retainers equipped with microsensors.

Authors:  Sait İshakoğlu; Serpil Çokakoğlu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.684

5.  Assessment of Factors Affecting Adolescent Patients' Compliance with Hawley and Vacuum Formed Retainers.

Authors:  Behnam Mirzakouchaki; Sajjad Shirazi; Reza Sharghi; Samaneh Shirazi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.

Authors:  Stephen Barlin; Roland Smith; Ray Reed; Jonathan Sandy; Anthony John Ireland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Survey on Retention Protocols Among Turkish Orthodontists.

Authors:  Aylin Paşaoğlu; Işıl Aras; Ali Mert; Aynur Aras
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 8.  Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces.

Authors:  Simon J Littlewood; Declan T Millett; Bridget Doubleday; David R Bearn; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

9.  Effects of wear time recording on the patient's compliance.

Authors:  Alexander Pauls; Manuel Nienkemper; Agamemnon Panayotidis; Benedict Wilmes; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 10.  The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dalya Al-Moghrabi; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.