Literature DB >> 17902176

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in sheep: objective assessments including confocal arthroscopy.

C W Jones1, C Willers, A Keogh, D Smolinski, D Fick, P J Yates, T B Kirk, M H Zheng.   

Abstract

The assessment of cartilage repair has largely been limited to macroscopic observation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or destructive biopsy. The aims of this study were to establish an ovine model of articular cartilage injury repair and to examine the efficacy of nondestructive techniques for assessing cartilage regeneration by matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). The development of nondestructive assessment techniques facilitates the monitoring of repair treatments in both experimental animal models and human clinical subjects. Defects (Ø 6 mm) were created on the trochlea and medial femoral condyle of 21 sheep randomized into untreated controls or one of two treatment arms: MACI or collagen-only membrane. Each group was divided into 8-, 10-, and 12-week time points. Repair outcomes were examined using laser scanning confocal arthroscopy (LSCA), MRI, histology, macroscopic ICRS grading, and biomechanical compression analysis. Interobserver analysis of the randomized blinded scoring of LSCA images validated our scoring protocol. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated the correlation between LSCA, MRI, and ICRS grading. Testing of overall treatment effect independent of time point revealed significant differences between MACI and control groups for all sites and assessment modalities (Asym Sig < 0.05), except condyle histology. Biomechanical analysis suggests that while MACI tissue may resemble native tissue histologically in the early stages of remodeling, the biomechanical properties remain inferior at least in the short term. This study demonstrates the potential of a multisite sheep model of articular cartilage defect repair and its assessment via nondestructive methods. Copyright 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17902176     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  17 in total

1.  A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Siamak Saifzadeh; Flavia Medeiros Savi; Constantin E Dlaska; Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Johannes C Reichert; Martin Wullschleger; Jiongyu Ren; Amaia Cipitria; Jacqui A McGovern; Roland Steck; Michael Wagels; Maria Ann Woodruff; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  The elusive path to cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Ernst B Hunziker
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  High mesenchymal stem cell seeding densities in hyaluronic acid hydrogels produce engineered cartilage with native tissue properties.

Authors:  Isaac E Erickson; Sydney R Kestle; Kilief H Zellars; Megan J Farrell; Minwook Kim; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Modeling and Staging of Osteoarthritis Progression Using Serial CT Imaging and Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Candace Flynn; Mark Hurtig; Emma Lamoure; Erin Cummins; Valeria Roati; Mark Lowerison; Sang Young Jeong; Wonil Oh; Alex Zur Linden
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  In vivo evaluation of biomechanical properties in the patellofemoral joint after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation by means of quantitative T2 MRI.

Authors:  M L Pachowsky; S Trattnig; B Wondrasch; S Apprich; S Marlovits; A Mauerer; Goetz H Welsch; M Blanke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Cartilage repair techniques of the talus: An update.

Authors:  Mike H Baums; Wolfgang Schultz; Tanja Kostuj; Hans-Michael Klinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 7.  Success rates and immunologic responses of autogenic, allogenic, and xenogenic treatments to repair articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  Christopher M Revell; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  [Defect models for the regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals].

Authors:  B Schneider-Wald; A K von Thaden; M L R Schwarz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  A low morbidity surgical approach to the sheep femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Henning Madry
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Clinical application of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Junji Iwasa; Lars Engebretsen; Yosuke Shima; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.