OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mortality risk, and compared the predictive ability of Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with self-rated health (SRH). METHODS: Data were from the 1994/95 Canadian National Population Health Survey, consisting of 12,375 women and men aged 18 and older. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to estimate mortality risk over eight years. RESULTS: Mortality risks for people reporting good, fair, and poor health at baseline were, respectively, 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 2.00), 1.97 (1.35, 2.88), and 3.21 (2.08, 4.95) times greater than those who reported excellent health. In a model excluding SRH, the effect of HUI3 on mortality was strong and significant (HR = 0.47; 95%, 0.33, 0.67) when adjusted for possible confounders. When HUI3 and SRH were considered simultaneously, the effect of the HUI3 on mortality was somewhat attenuated, but still significant (HR = 0.61, 0.42, 0.89) after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Although SRH is a modestly stronger predictor of mortality than HUI3, HUI3 adds to the mortality prediction ability of SRH.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mortality risk, and compared the predictive ability of Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with self-rated health (SRH). METHODS: Data were from the 1994/95 Canadian National Population Health Survey, consisting of 12,375 women and men aged 18 and older. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to estimate mortality risk over eight years. RESULTS: Mortality risks for people reporting good, fair, and poor health at baseline were, respectively, 1.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 2.00), 1.97 (1.35, 2.88), and 3.21 (2.08, 4.95) times greater than those who reported excellent health. In a model excluding SRH, the effect of HUI3 on mortality was strong and significant (HR = 0.47; 95%, 0.33, 0.67) when adjusted for possible confounders. When HUI3 and SRH were considered simultaneously, the effect of the HUI3 on mortality was somewhat attenuated, but still significant (HR = 0.61, 0.42, 0.89) after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Although SRH is a modestly stronger predictor of mortality than HUI3, HUI3 adds to the mortality prediction ability of SRH.
Authors: David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Vilija R Joyce; Mark W Smith; Kirsten L Johansen; Mark L Unruh; Andrew M Siroka; Theresa Z O'Connor; Paul M Palevsky Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Stephanie A Robert; Dasha Cherepanov; Mari Palta; Nancy Cross Dunham; David Feeny; Dennis G Fryback Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Andrea Otero-Rodríguez; Luz María León-Muñoz; Teresa Balboa-Castillo; José R Banegas; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Pilar Guallar-Castillón Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Julián Benito-León; Elan D Louis; Jesús Rivera-Navarro; María José Medrano; Saturio Vega; Félix Bermejo-Pareja Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: David Feeny; Rochelle Garner; Julie Bernier; Amanda Thompson; Bentson H McFarland; Nathalie Huguet; Mark S Kaplan; Nancy A Ross; Chris M Blanchard Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2013-10-31
Authors: Colleen J Maxwell; Jian Kang; Jennifer D Walker; Jenny X Zhang; David B Hogan; David H Feeny; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 3.186