Literature DB >> 17897214

Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.

G Moore1, C Griffith.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate factors influencing the recovery of micro-organisms from surfaces using traditional swabbing techniques. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Stainless steel squares were inoculated with known levels (approx. 2.7x10(2)-2.7x10(4)) of either Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus and sampled using different swab/solution combinations. Overlaying the coupons with agar allowed colonies remaining on the surface to be enumerated. Conventional cultivation was used to determine the ease with which the bacteria were released from the swabs and the viability of the organisms within the solutions over a 24-h period. Minimal bacterial growth occurred when the samples were stored at 4 degrees C. At room temperature, whilst the presence of nutrients significantly increased bacterial numbers over time, the addition of Tween 80 to nutrient depleted environments significantly reduced the viability of Staph. aureus. The percentage of bacteria released from directly inoculated swabs was significantly higher than that recovered from surface swabs, highlighting the importance of effectively removing bacterial contaminants from a surface. Increasing the level of mechanical energy generated during swabbing increased the number of bacteria removed from a wet surface. However, it is hypothesized that cellular damage, perhaps caused by the swabbing action itself, may have reduced recoverability from a dry surface. Nonetheless, an increased ability to effectively remove bacteria from a surface did not necessarily correlate with higher bacterial recovery, implying that an equally important factor in terms of swabbing efficiency is the ability of a swab to effectively release bacteria into a diluent.
CONCLUSIONS: Both swab and wetting solution can influence the number of bacteria recovered. Under the experimental conditions described here, the use of swabs coated with a brush-textured nylon flock in combination with a non-growth-enhancing wetting solution appeared the best system to use when sampling a wet surface. However, this combination may not always be ideal and proper consideration must be given to how the sample is to be taken, transported and, if necessary, stored prior to analysis. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Careful selection of swabbing materials can increase the sensitivity of traditional microbiological analysis. However, any improvements made are likely to be insignificant in relation to the overall poor performance of the swabbing technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17897214     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03330.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  27 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Swab type, moistening, and preenrichment for Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces.

Authors:  Timothy F Landers; Armando Hoet; Thomas E Wittum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Fecal indicator bacteria contamination of fomites and household demand for surface disinfection products: a case study from Peru.

Authors:  Timothy R Julian; Luke H MacDonald; Yayi Guo; Sara J Marks; Margaret Kosek; Pablo P Yori; Silvia Rengifo Pinedo; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Listeria monocytogenes in Biofilms on Stainless Steel.

Authors:  Tobyn A Branck; Matthew J Hurley; Gianna N Prata; Christina A Crivello; Patrick J Marek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Recommendations for Best Disinfectant Practices to Reduce the Spread of Infection via Wrestling Mats.

Authors:  Linda Mull Young; Vicki Abram Motz; Emily R Markey; Suzanne C Young; Ronald E Beaschler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Validation of dipslides as a tool for environmental sampling in a real-life hospital setting.

Authors:  T Ibfelt; C Foged; L P Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Efficacy of a Sonicating Swab for Removal and Capture of Microorganisms from Experimental and Natural Contaminated Surfaces.

Authors:  Gianna P Ahnrud; Alma J Mendoza; Matthew J Hurley; Patrick J Marek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Evaluation of a New Environmental Sampling Protocol for Detection of Human Norovirus on Inanimate Surfaces.

Authors:  Geun Woo Park; David Lee; Aimee Treffiletti; Mario Hrsak; Jill Shugart; Jan Vinjé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Guidance on Frequency and Location of Environmental Sampling for Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Alyssa N Sbarra; Anthony D Harris; J Kristie Johnson; Laurence S Madger; Lyndsay M O'Hara; Sarah S Jackson; Kerri A Thom
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  Semi-direct lysis of swabs and evaluation of their efficiencies to recover human noroviruses GI and GII from surfaces.

Authors:  Ann De Keuckelaere; Ambroos Stals; Mieke Uyttendaele
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.