Literature DB >> 19429546

Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples.

Cheryl Fairfield Estill1, Paul A Baron, Jeremy K Beard, Misty J Hein, Lloyd D Larsen, Laura Rose, Frank W Schaefer, Judith Noble-Wang, Lisa Hodges, H D Alan Lindquist, Gregory J Deye, Matthew J Arduino.   

Abstract

After the 2001 anthrax incidents, surface sampling techniques for biological agents were found to be inadequately validated, especially at low surface loadings. We aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores within a chamber to achieve very low surface loading (ca. 3, 30, and 200 CFU per 100 cm(2)). Steel and carpet coupons seeded in the chamber were sampled with swab (103 cm(2)) or wipe or vacuum (929 cm(2)) surface sampling methods and analyzed at three laboratories. Agar settle plates (60 cm(2)) were the reference for determining recovery efficiency (RE). The minimum estimated surface concentrations to achieve a 95% response rate based on probit regression were 190, 15, and 44 CFU/100 cm(2) for sampling steel surfaces and 40, 9.2, and 28 CFU/100 cm(2) for sampling carpet surfaces with swab, wipe, and vacuum methods, respectively; however, these results should be cautiously interpreted because of high observed variability. Mean REs at the highest surface loading were 5.0%, 18%, and 3.7% on steel and 12%, 23%, and 4.7% on carpet for the swab, wipe, and vacuum methods, respectively. Precision (coefficient of variation) was poor at the lower surface concentrations but improved with increasing surface concentration. The best precision was obtained with wipe samples on carpet, achieving 38% at the highest surface concentration. The wipe sampling method detected B. anthracis at lower estimated surface concentrations and had higher RE and better precision than the other methods. These results may guide investigators to more meaningfully conduct environmental sampling, quantify contamination levels, and conduct risk assessment for humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19429546      PMCID: PMC2704799          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02549-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

1.  Update: Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax--Connecticut, 2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  Use of a generalized linear mixed model to reduce excessive heterogeneity in petroleum spray oil bioassay data.

Authors:  I M Barchia; G A Herron; A R Gilmour
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Secondary aerosolization of viable Bacillus anthracis spores in a contaminated US Senate Office.

Authors:  Christopher P Weis; Anthony J Intrepido; Aubrey K Miller; Patricia G Cowin; Mark A Durno; Joan S Gebhardt; Robert Bull
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Molecular investigation of the Aum Shinrikyo anthrax release in Kameido, Japan.

Authors:  P Keim; K L Smith; C Keys; H Takahashi; T Kurata; A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Inhalational anthrax: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  S Shafazand; R Doyle; S Ruoss; A Weinacker; T A Raffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Bacillus anthracis contamination and inhalational anthrax in a mail processing and distribution center.

Authors:  W T Sanderson; R R Stoddard; A S Echt; C A Piacitelli; D Kim; J Horan; M M Davies; R E McCleery; P Muller; T M Schnorr; E M Ward; T R Hales
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  The critical role of pathology in the investigation of bioterrorism-related cutaneous anthrax.

Authors:  Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher Paddock; Patricia Greer; Kathleen Tatti; Marc Fischer; Marci Layton; Michael Philips; Eddy Bresnitz; Conrad P Quinn; Tanja Popovic; Bradley A Perkins; Sherif R Zaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Dose-response models for inhalation of Bacillus anthracis spores: interspecies comparisons.

Authors:  Timothy A Bartrand; Mark H Weir; Charles N Haas
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States.

Authors:  J A Jernigan; D S Stephens; D A Ashford; C Omenaca; M S Topiel; M Galbraith; M Tapper; T L Fisk; S Zaki; T Popovic; R F Meyer; C P Quinn; S A Harper; S K Fridkin; J J Sejvar; C W Shepard; M McConnell; J Guarner; W J Shieh; J M Malecki; J L Gerberding; J M Hughes; B A Perkins
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings.

Authors:  Daniel B Jernigan; Pratima L Raghunathan; Beth P Bell; Ross Brechner; Eddy A Bresnitz; Jay C Butler; Marty Cetron; Mitch Cohen; Timothy Doyle; Marc Fischer; Carolyn Greene; Kevin S Griffith; Jeannette Guarner; James L Hadler; James A Hayslett; Richard Meyer; Lyle R Petersen; Michael Phillips; Robert Pinner; Tanja Popovic; Conrad P Quinn; Jennita Reefhuis; Dori Reissman; Nancy Rosenstein; Anne Schuchat; Wun-Ju Shieh; Larry Siegal; David L Swerdlow; Fred C Tenover; Marc Traeger; John W Ward; Isaac Weisfuse; Steven Wiersma; Kevin Yeskey; Sherif Zaki; David A Ashford; Bradley A Perkins; Steve Ostroff; James Hughes; David Fleming; Jeffrey P Koplan; Julie L Gerberding
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  17 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Transport of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki via fomites.

Authors:  Sheila Van Cuyk; Lee Ann B Veal; Beverley Simpson; Kristin M Omberg
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2011-09

3.  Evaluation of procedures for the collection, processing, and analysis of biomolecules from low-biomass surfaces.

Authors:  K Kwan; M Cooper; M T La Duc; P Vaishampayan; C Stam; J N Benardini; G Scalzi; C Moissl-Eichinger; K Venkateswaran
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Lisa Hodges; Heather O'Connell; Judith Noble-Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Use of a foam spatula for sampling surfaces after bioaerosol deposition.

Authors:  Rafal Lewandowski; Krystyna Kozlowska; Malgorzata Szpakowska; Malgorzata Stepinska; Elzbieta A Trafny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Development of an aerosol surface inoculation method for bacillus spores.

Authors:  Sang Don Lee; Shawn P Ryan; Emily Gibb Snyder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Comparison of swab and sponge methodologies for identification of Acinetobacter baumannii from the hospital environment.

Authors:  Kerri A Thom; Tracy Howard; Sophie Sembajwe; Anthony D Harris; Paula Strassle; Brian S Caffo; Karen C Carroll; J Kristie Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Parameters affecting spore recovery from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Sandra M Da Silva; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.