Literature DB >> 17896826

Electrospray characteristic curves: in pursuit of improved performance in the nanoflow regime.

Ioan Marginean1, Ryan T Kelly, Jason S Page, Keqi Tang, Richard D Smith.   

Abstract

Depending on its coordinates in the parameter space, an electrospray can manifest in one of several known regimes--stable, quasi-stable, transitional chaotic, and nonaxial--that ultimately impact measurement sensitivity and precision. An electrospray operating in the cone-jet regime provides relatively large and stable spray current, as well as smaller initial droplets, that are prerequisites for higher sensitivity and quality mass spectrometric analyses. However, the dynamic conditions encountered, for example, in gradient elution-based liquid separations create difficulties for continuous operation in this regime. We present a preliminary study aimed at providing the basis for stabilizing the electrospray in the cone-jet regime. On the basis of spray current measurements obtained using solvent conditions typically found in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, an improved description of the cone-jet stability island is provided by including transitions to and from the recently described astable regime. Additionally, the experimental conditions in which the astable regime marks the transition between pulsating and cone-jet regimes are further clarified.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17896826      PMCID: PMC2625288          DOI: 10.1021/ac0707986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  19 in total

1.  Electrical equivalence of electrospray ionization with conducting and nonconducting needles.

Authors:  G S Jackson; C G Enke
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Singularity during the onset of an electrohydrodynamic spout

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-08-07       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Flexing the electrified meniscus: the birth of a jet in electrosprays.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Lida Parvin; Linda Heffernan; Akos Vertes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Pulsation modes and the effect of applied voltage on current and flow rate in nanoelectrospray.

Authors:  Matthew S Alexander; Mark D Paine; John P W Stark
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Order-chaos-order transitions in electrosprays: the electrified dripping faucet.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Peter Nemes; Akos Vertes
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Chemically etched open tubular and monolithic emitters for nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Jason S Page; Quanzhou Luo; Ronald J Moore; Daniel J Orton; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers.

Authors:  C M Whitehouse; R N Dreyer; M Yamashita; J B Fenn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Charge limits on droplets during evaporation.

Authors:  Kuo-Yen Li; Haohua Tu; Asit K Ray
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Durable gold-coated fused silica capillaries for use in electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  M S Kriger; K D Cook; R S Ramsey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Physical/chemical separations in the break-up of highly charged droplets from electrosprays.

Authors:  K Tang; R D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  14 in total

1.  A study of electrospray ionization emitters with differing geometries with respect to flow rate and electrospray voltage.

Authors:  Brent R Reschke; Aaron T Timperman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Capillary-based multi nanoelectrospray emitters: improvements in ion transmission efficiency and implementation with capillary reversed-phase LC-ESI-MS.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Jason S Page; Rui Zhao; Wei-Jun Qian; Heather M Mottaz; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Current-controlled nanospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alexei Gapeev; Alberto Berton; Daniele Fabris
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Surface tension effects on submerged electrosprays.

Authors:  Alvaro G Marín; Ignacio G Loscertales; Antonio Barrero
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Nanoelectrospray emitter arrays providing interemitter electric field uniformity.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Jason S Page; Ioan Marginean; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Elastomeric microchip electrospray emitter for stable cone-jet mode operation in the nanoflow regime.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Keqi Tang; Daniel Irimia; Mehmet Toner; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Picoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry using narrow-bore chemically etched emitters.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith; Ryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Effect of pressure on electrospray characteristics.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Jason S Page; Ryan T Kelly; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Multinozzle emitter arrays for nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Pan Mao; Hung-Ta Wang; Peidong Yang; Daojing Wang
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Analytical characterization of the electrospray ion source in the nanoflow regime.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Ryan T Kelly; David C Prior; Brian L LaMarche; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.