Literature DB >> 10489527

Electrical equivalence of electrospray ionization with conducting and nonconducting needles.

G S Jackson1, C G Enke.   

Abstract

An electrical equivalent circuit is derived for the electrospray process. It is a series circuit which consists of the power supply, the electrochemical contact to the solution, the solution resistance (R(s)), a constant-current regulator which represents the processes of charge separation and charge transport in the gap between the spray needle aperture and the counter electrode, and charge neutralization at the counter electrode. A current i, established by the constant-current regulator flows throughout the entire circuit. Current-voltage curves are developed for each element in the circuit. From these it is shown that in the case where R(s) is negligible (the power supply is connected directly to a conducting needle) the shape of the current-voltage curve is dictated by the constant-current regulator established by the charge separation process, the gap, and the counter electrode. The solution resistance may be significant if a nonconducting needle is used so that the electrochemical contact to the solution is remote from the tip. Experiments with a nonconducting spray needle quantify the effect of the solution resistance on the current-voltage curve. Subtracting the iRs voltage from Vapp (power supply voltage) yields the current-voltage curve for the constant-current regulator. When iRs drop is a significant fraction of Vapp, the current-voltage curve of the constant-current regulator is changed substantially from the case when the solution resistance is negligible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10489527     DOI: 10.1021/ac9902244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  13 in total

1.  Insights into analyte electrolysis in an electrospray emitter from chronopotentiometry experiments and mass transport calculations

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Efficiency of nano-electrospray ionization.

Authors:  Ayman El-Faramawy; K W Michael Siu; Bruce A Thomson
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Monitoring the zinc affinity of the metallo-beta-lactamase CphA by automated nanoESI-MS.

Authors:  Kris De Vriendt; Gonzalez Van Driessche; Bart Devreese; Carine Bebrone; Christine Anne; Jean-Marie Frère; Moreno Galleni; Jozef Van Beeumen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Electrospray characteristic curves: in pursuit of improved performance in the nanoflow regime.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Ryan T Kelly; Jason S Page; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A fused silica micro-electrospray tip with an electrically floating metal wire insert to achieve more stable electrospray ionization.

Authors:  YunJo Chung; ChungUng Park; Joseph Kwon; Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Current-controlled nanospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alexei Gapeev; Alberto Berton; Daniele Fabris
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Perspective on electrospray ionization and its relation to electrochemistry.

Authors:  Boguslaw P Pozniak; Richard B Cole
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Direct Analysis of Aqueous Solutions and Untreated Biological Samples Using Nanoelectrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry with Pipette Tip in Series with High-Ohmic Resistor as Ion Source.

Authors:  Matiur Rahman; Debo Wu; Konstantin Chingin
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Effects of ground loop currents on signal intensities in electrospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Richard A Ochran; Lars Konermann
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Electrochemical Ionization and Analyte Charging in the Array of Micromachined UltraSonic Electrospray (AMUSE) Ion Source.

Authors:  Thomas P Forbes; F Levent Degertekin; Andrei G Fedorov
Journal:  J Electroanal Chem (Lausanne)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.