Literature DB >> 17896777

Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo.

Frank M Klenke1, Yuelian Liu, Huipin Yuan, Ernst B Hunziker, Klaus A Siebenrock, Willy Hofstetter.   

Abstract

The repair of bone defects with biomaterials depends on a sufficient vascularization of the implantation site. We analyzed the effect of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of biphasic calcium phosphate particles, which were implanted into critical-sized cranial defects in Balb/c mice. Dense particles and particles with pore sizes in the ranges 40-70, 70-140, 140-210, and 210-280 microm were tested (n = 6 animals per group). Angiogenesis, vascularization, and leukocyte-endothelium interactions were monitored for 28 days by intravital microscopy. The formation of new bone and the bone-interface contact (BIC) were determined histomorphometrically. Twenty-eight days after implantation, the functional capillary density was significantly higher with ceramic particles whose pore sizes exceeded 140 microm [140-210 microm: 6.6 (+/-0.8) mm/mm(2); 210-280 microm: 7.3 (+/-0.6) mm/mm(2)] than with those whose pore sizes were lesser than 140 microm [40-70 microm: 5.3 (+/-0.4) mm/mm(2); 70-140 microm: 5.6 (+/-0.3) mm/mm(2)] or with dense particles [5.7 (+/-0.8) mm/mm(2)]. The volume of newly-formed bone deposited within the implants increased as the pore size increased [40-70 microm: 0.07 (+/-0.02) mm(3); 70-140 microm: 0.10 (+/-0.06) mm(3); 140-210 microm: 0.13 (+/-0.05) mm(3); 210-280 microm: 0.15 (+/-0.06) mm(3)]. Similar results were observed for the BIC. The data demonstrates pore size to be a critical parameter governing the dynamic processes of vascularization and osseointegration of bone substitutes. Copyright 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17896777     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  47 in total

1.  Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Douglas J Adams; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement.

Authors:  Lonnissa H Nguyen; Nasim Annabi; Mehdi Nikkhah; Hojae Bae; Loïc Binan; Sangwon Park; Yunqing Kang; Yunzhi Yang; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) and endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) growth and adhesion in six different bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  J Schultheiss; C Seebach; D Henrich; K Wilhelm; J H Barker; J Frank
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Angiogenic and osteogenic regeneration in rats via calcium phosphate scaffold and endothelial cell co-culture with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), human umbilical cord MSCs, human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived MSCs and human embryonic stem cell-derived MSCs.

Authors:  Wenchuan Chen; Xian Liu; Qianmin Chen; Chongyun Bao; Liang Zhao; Zhimin Zhu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  Effect of different hydroxyapatite incorporation methods on the structural and biological properties of porous collagen scaffolds for bone repair.

Authors:  Alan J Ryan; John P Gleeson; Amos Matsiko; Emmet M Thompson; Fergal J O'Brien
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Angiogenic biomaterials to promote therapeutic regeneration and investigate disease progression.

Authors:  Mai T Ngo; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Migration of co-cultured endothelial cells and osteoblasts in composite hydroxyapatite/polylactic acid scaffolds.

Authors:  Amita R Shah; Sarita R Shah; Sunho Oh; Joo L Ong; Joseph C Wenke; C Mauli Agrawal
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Review on material parameters to enhance bone cell function in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Eric Madsen; Merjem Mededovic; David H Kohn
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.407

10.  Osteogenic and angiogenic potentials of monocultured and co-cultured human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human-umbilical-vein endothelial cells on three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold.

Authors:  Yunqing Kang; Sungwoo Kim; Monica Fahrenholtz; Ali Khademhosseini; Yunzhi Yang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.