Literature DB >> 22765012

Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement.

Lonnissa H Nguyen1, Nasim Annabi, Mehdi Nikkhah, Hojae Bae, Loïc Binan, Sangwon Park, Yunqing Kang, Yunzhi Yang, Ali Khademhosseini.   

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in bone tissue engineering (TE) in the past decade. However, classical bone TE strategies have been hampered mainly due to the lack of vascularization within the engineered bone constructs, resulting in poor implant survival and integration. In an effort toward clinical success of engineered constructs, new TE concepts have arisen to develop bone substitutes that potentially mimic native bone tissue structure and function. Large tissue replacements have failed in the past due to the slow penetration of the host vasculature, leading to necrosis at the central region of the engineered tissues. For this reason, multiple microscale strategies have been developed to induce and incorporate vascular networks within engineered bone constructs before implantation in order to achieve successful integration with the host tissue. Previous attempts to engineer vascularized bone tissue only focused on the effect of a single component among the three main components of TE (scaffold, cells, or signaling cues) and have only achieved limited success. However, with efforts to improve the engineered bone tissue substitutes, bone TE approaches have become more complex by combining multiple strategies simultaneously. The driving force behind combining various TE strategies is to produce bone replacements that more closely recapitulate human physiology. Here, we review and discuss the limitations of current bone TE approaches and possible strategies to improve vascularization in bone tissue substitutes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22765012      PMCID: PMC3458624          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  179 in total

1.  In vitro effects of combined and sequential delivery of two bone growth factors.

Authors:  A T Raiche; D A Puleo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs.

Authors:  K F Leong; C M Cheah; C K Chua
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Cell proliferation and oxygen diffusion in a vascularising scaffold.

Authors:  Kerry A Landman; Anna Q Cai
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Micropatterning of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels with biomolecules to regulate and guide endothelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  James J Moon; Mariah S Hahn; Iris Kim; Barbara A Nsiah; Jennifer L West
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Effect of human endothelial cells on human bone marrow stromal cell phenotype: role of VEGF?

Authors:  F Villars; L Bordenave; R Bareille; J Amédée
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2000-09-14       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Regeneration of bicortical defects in the iliac crest of estrogen-deficient sheep, using new biodegradable polyurethane bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  Sylwester Gogolewski; Katarzyna Gorna; A Simon Turner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a newly described mediator of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Pouneh Kermani; Barbara Hempstead
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.677

8.  Porosity and pore size of beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Ingo Beyen; Philipp Niemeyer; Reto Luginbühl; Marc Bohner; Wiltrud Richter
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Preliminary in vivo report on the osteocompatibility of poly(anhydride-co-imides) evaluated in a tibial model.

Authors:  S E Ibim; K E Uhrich; M Attawia; V R Shastri; S F El-Amin; R Bronson; R Langer; C T Laurencin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

Review 10.  A brief review of bone adaptation to unloading.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Kazunori Hamamura; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 7.691

View more
  65 in total

1.  Dynamic Bioreactor Culture of High Volume Engineered Bone Tissue.

Authors:  Bao-Ngoc B Nguyen; Henry Ko; Rebecca A Moriarty; Julie M Etheridge; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Mechanical and Vascular Cues Synergistically Enhance Osteogenesis in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Andrew J Steward; Jacqueline H Cole; Frances S Ligler; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Recent advances in the application of mesoporous silica-based nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Reza Eivazzadeh-Keihan; Karim Khanmohammadi Chenab; Reza Taheri-Ledari; Jafar Mosafer; Seyed Masoud Hashemi; Ahad Mokhtarzadeh; Ali Maleki; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  Periodontal tissue regeneration using enzymatically solidified chitosan hydrogels with or without cell loading.

Authors:  Xiang-Zhen Yan; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Xinjie Cai; Na Yu; John A Jansen; Fang Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

7.  Amphiphilic degradable polymers for immobilization and sustained delivery of sphingosine 1-phosphate.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Jie Song
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Bone up: craniomandibular development and hard-tissue biomineralization in neonate mice.

Authors:  Khari D Thompson; Holly E Weiss-Bilka; Elizabeth B McGough; Matthew J Ravosa
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Dual-phase osteogenic and vasculogenic engineered tissue for bone formation.

Authors:  Rameshwar R Rao; Marina L Vigen; Alexis W Peterson; David J Caldwell; Andrew J Putnam; Jan P Stegemann
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.