Literature DB >> 17896167

Curative laparoscopic resection for pancreatic neoplasms: a critical analysis from a single institution.

Laureano Fernández-Cruz1, Rebeca Cosa, Laia Blanco, Sammy Levi, Miguel-Angel López-Boado, Salvador Navarro.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LPS) has seen significant development but much of the knowledge refers to small and benign pancreatic tumors. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and long-term outcome of the laparoscopic approach in patients with benign, premalignant, and overt malignant lesions of the pancreas. This study, currently, is the largest single center experience worldwide. One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatic surgery from April 1998 to April 2007, 20 patients with cysts or pseudocysts for acute and chronic pancreatitis, laparoscopic pancreatic drainage was performed, and were excluded from the analysis. The 103 patients were divided based on preoperative diagnosis: group I, inflammatory tumors for chronic pancreatitis (eight patients); group II, cystic pancreatic neoplasms (29 patients); group III, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (10 patients); group IV, neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NETs) (43 patients); and group V ductal adenocarcinoma (13 patients). The median tumor size was 5.3 cm. Pathologic data include R(0) or R(1) resection (transection margins on the specimen were inked). Perioperative data, postoperative complications, and resection modalities were compared using statistical analysis. Long-term outcomes were analysed by tumor recurrence and patient survival. The overall conversion rate was 7%. Laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection was performed in 82 patients (79.6%). Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap SPDP) was performed in 52 patients (63.7%), but with splenic vessels preservation in 22% and without splenic vessels preservation in 41.5%. Laparoscopic en-bloc splenopancreatectomy (Lap SxDP) was performed in 30 patients (36.6%) and laparoscopic enucleation (Lap En) in 20 patients (19.4%). There was no mortality. The overall complication rate was 25.2, 16.7, and 40% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively. The overall morbidity rate was significantly higher (p>0.05) in the group of Lap SPDP without splenic vessels preservation comparing with Lap SPDP with splenic vessels preservation because of the occurrence of splenic complications (20.6%). The overall pancreatic fistulas was 7.7, 10, and 35% after Lap SPDP, Lap SxDP, and Lap En, respectively; the severity of fistula was significantly higher in the Lap En group (p>0.05). The mean hospital stay was within 1 week in all groups, except in the group of ductal adenocarcinoma, which is 8 days. In this series, 27 patients (26.2%) had malignant disease. R(0) resection was achieved in 90% of ductal adenocarcinoma and 100% for other malignant tumors. The median survival for ductal adenocarcinoma patients was 14 months. This series demonstrates that LPS is feasible and safe in benign-appearing and malignant lesions of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17896167     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0266-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  49 in total

1.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Mabrut; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Juan Santiago Azagra; Claudio Bassi; Georges Delvaux; Joseph Weerts; Jean-Michel Fabre; Jean Boulez; Jacques Baulieux; Jean-Louis Peix; Jean-François Gigot
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Howard; Joseph E Krug; Jian Yu; Nick J Zyromski; C Max Schmidt; Lewis E Jacobson; James A Madura; Eric A Wiebke; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas: tumor growth rates and recommendations for treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer F Tseng; Andrew L Warshaw; Dushyant V Sahani; Gregory Y Lauwers; David W Rattner; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic approach for solitary insulinoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: current indications and surgical results.

Authors:  S Shimizu; M Tanaka; H Konomi; K Mizumoto; K Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation?

Authors:  M A Talamini; R Moesinger; C J Yeo; B Poulose; R H Hruban; J L Cameron; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  75 in total

1.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients.

Authors:  Mushegh A Sahakyan; Airazat M Kazaryan; Majd Rawashdeh; David Fuks; Mark Shmavonyan; Sven-Petter Haugvik; Knut Jørgen Labori; Trond Buanes; Bård Ingvald Røsok; Dejan Ignjatovic; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Tung Wu; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Shih-Ching Kang; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kuroki; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic three-port distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Gokulakkrishna Subhas; Natasha Gupta; Vijay K Mittal; Michael J Jacobs
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Christopher D Briggs; Christopher D Mann; Glen R B Irving; Christopher P Neal; Mark Peterson; Iain C Cameron; David P Berry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Changes in gastrosplenic circulation and splenic function after distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation and splenic vessel excision.

Authors:  Gustavo Kohan; Carlos G Ocampo; Hugo I Zandalazini; Roberto Klappenbach; Bernabe M Quesada; Luis T Chiappetta Porras; Juan Alvarez Rodriguez; Alejandro S Oria
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nakul P Valsangkar; Devon M Bush; James S Michaelson; Cristina R Ferrone; Jennifer A Wargo; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw; Sarah P Thayer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Defining quality for distal pancreatectomy: does the laparoscopic approach protect patients from poor quality outcomes?

Authors:  Marshall S Baker; Karen L Sherman; Susan Stocker; Amanda V Hayman; David J Bentrem; Richard A Prinz; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Pancreatic cancer: Open or minimally invasive surgery?

Authors:  Yu-Hua Zhang; Cheng-Wu Zhang; Zhi-Ming Hu; De-Fei Hong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.