INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). METHODS: Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). RESULTS: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). CONCLUSIONS: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of LN variables (N0/N1), numbers of positive lymph nodes (PLN), and lymph node ratio (LNR) in the context of the total number of examined lymph nodes (ELN). METHODS:Patients from SEER and a single institution (MGH) were reviewed and survival analyses performed in subgroups based on numbers of ELN to calculate excess risk of death (hazard ratio, HR). RESULTS: In SEER and MGH, higher numbers of ELN improved the overall survival for N0 patients. The prognostic significance (N0/N1) and PLN were too variable as the importance of a single PLN depended on the total number of LN dissected. LNR consistently correlated with survival once a certain number of lymph nodes were dissected (≥13 in SEER and ≥17 in the MGH dataset). CONCLUSIONS: Better survival for N0 patients with increasing ELN likely represents improved staging. PLN have some predictive value but the ELN strongly influence their impact on survival, suggesting the need for a ratio-based classification. LNR strongly correlates with outcome provided that a certain number of lymph nodes is evaluated, suggesting that the prognostic accuracy of any LN variable depends on the total number of ELN.
Authors: Jae Hoon Lee; Kyeong Geun Lee; Tae Kyung Ha; Young Jin Jun; Seung Sam Paik; Hwon Kyum Park; Kwang Soo Lee Journal: Am Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Axel Richter; Marco Niedergethmann; Jörg W Sturm; Dietmar Lorenz; Stefan Post; Michael Trede Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-02-27 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Charles J Yeo; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Taylor A Sohn; Kurtis A Campbell; Patricia K Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Ross A Abrams; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Cynthia E Weber; Eileen A Bock; Michael G Hurtuk; Gerard J Abood; Jack Pickleman; Margo Shoup; Gerard V Aranha Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-11-23 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kim C Honselmann; Ilaria Pergolini; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Vikram Deshpande; David Ting; Martin S Taylor; Louisa Bolm; Motaz Qadan; Ulrich Wellner; Marta Sandini; Dirk Bausch; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Tobias Keck; Cristina R Ferrone Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Shaunagh McDermott; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ralph Weissleder; Mukesh G Harisinghani Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Hai V Nguyen; Jesse Gore; Xin Zhong; Sudha S Savant; Samantha Deitz-McElyea; C Max Schmidt; Michael G House; Murray Korc Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.452