H J Teede1, I A Jayasuriya, C P Gilfillan. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes Southern Health, Monash Institute of Public Health Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. helena.teede@med.monash.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine current fracture prevention strategies through the recognition, investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients presenting to acute hospitals with minimal-trauma fracture. METHODS: A retrospective audit using a standardized database was conducted in 16 Australian hospitals. This involved 1829 cases of minimal-trauma fracture initially presenting to hospital emergency departments during 2003-2005. Cases of minimal-trauma fracture were retrospectively identified using diagnosis-related group fracture codes and case record review at each site. Relevant data were entered into a standardized database and analysed centrally and independently. Risk factors for osteoporosis, investigations, interventions and discharge follow up were recorded. RESULTS: The percentage of minimal-trauma fracture patients who underwent investigation or initiated therapy designed to prevent subsequent minimal-trauma fracture was obtained. Less than 13% of patients presenting to hospital with minimal-trauma fractures had risk factors for fracture identified. Ten per cent were appropriately investigated, 12% were commenced on calcium and 12% on vitamin D. Eight per cent started bisphosphonates and 1% selective oestrogens receptor modulators in the acute setting. CONCLUSION: Most patients presenting to Australian hospitals with minimal-trauma fracture are neither investigated nor treated for osteoporosis. As this group is at high risk of subsequent fracture, this is a missed opportunity to reduce fracture burden.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine current fracture prevention strategies through the recognition, investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients presenting to acute hospitals with minimal-trauma fracture. METHODS: A retrospective audit using a standardized database was conducted in 16 Australian hospitals. This involved 1829 cases of minimal-trauma fracture initially presenting to hospital emergency departments during 2003-2005. Cases of minimal-trauma fracture were retrospectively identified using diagnosis-related group fracture codes and case record review at each site. Relevant data were entered into a standardized database and analysed centrally and independently. Risk factors for osteoporosis, investigations, interventions and discharge follow up were recorded. RESULTS: The percentage of minimal-trauma fracturepatients who underwent investigation or initiated therapy designed to prevent subsequent minimal-trauma fracture was obtained. Less than 13% of patients presenting to hospital with minimal-trauma fractures had risk factors for fracture identified. Ten per cent were appropriately investigated, 12% were commenced on calcium and 12% on vitamin D. Eight per cent started bisphosphonates and 1% selective oestrogens receptor modulators in the acute setting. CONCLUSION: Most patients presenting to Australian hospitals with minimal-trauma fracture are neither investigated nor treated for osteoporosis. As this group is at high risk of subsequent fracture, this is a missed opportunity to reduce fracture burden.
Authors: L Iconaru; C Smeys; F Baleanu; V Kinnard; M Moreau; S Cappelle; M Surquin; M Rubinstein; S Rozenberg; M Paesmans; R Karmali; P Bergmann; J J Body Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: K Akesson; D Marsh; P J Mitchell; A R McLellan; J Stenmark; D D Pierroz; C Kyer; C Cooper Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.507