Literature DB >> 17894620

Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

T Alafifi1, R Kern, M Fehlings.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in older individuals. Controversy remains in terms of the optimal timing and indications for surgical intervention. In this context, it would be of benefit to define clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predictors of outcome after intervention for CSM.
OBJECTIVE: We studied subjects with clinically documented cervical myelopathy to evaluate the relationship among preoperative MRI signal change, clinical findings, and outcome after surgical intervention.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective case study of 76 CSM patients who underwent cervical decompressive surgery and who had pre- and postoperative MRI studies available for review. Preoperative clinical findings and MRI abnormalities on T1- (T1WI) and T2-weighted (T2WI) images were correlated with outcomes (Nurick scores; Odom's criteria) following surgical intervention. Postoperative MRIs were performed 2-4 months postsurgery to assess for adequacy of decompression and resolution of preoperative signal changes. The pattern of spinal cord signal intensity was classified as: Group A (MRI N/N), no intramedullary signal intensity abnormality on T1WI or T2WI; Group B (MRI N/Hi), no intramedullary signal intensity abnormality on T1WI and high intramedullary signal intensity on T2WI; Group C (MRI Lo/Hi), low intensity intramedullary signal abnormality on T1WI and high intensity intramedullary signal abnormality on T2WI. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS (version 8.2).
RESULTS: We evaluated 76 patients (57% males, mean age 62 years, range 30-89) who experienced preoperative symptoms for an average of 6.5 months (range 1 month to 9 years). Preoperative MRI studies demonstrated the following: Group A (MRI N/N) = 45; Group B (MRI N/Hi) = 23; and Group C (MRI Lo/Hi) = 8. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 2.5 years (range 2 months to 8.5 years). A positive Babinski sign and the presence of intrinsic hand muscle atrophy showed the greatest association with abnormal preoperative MRI signal change. High preoperative Nurick score, clonus, and leg spasticity were associated with a less favorable postoperative outcome. In Group B (MRI N/Hi), 11/23 (52.17%) patients had recovery to MRI N/N (P < .0001) at their follow-up scan.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high intramedullary signal change on T2WI who do not have clonus or spasticity may experience a good surgical outcome and may have reversal of the MRI abnormality. A less favorable surgical outcome is predicted by the presence of low intramedullary signal on T1WI, clonus, or spasticity. These data suggest that there may be a window of opportunity to obtain optimal surgical outcomes in patients with CSM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17894620     DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  28 in total

1.  Regional impairment of 18F-FDG uptake in the cervical spinal cord in patients with monosegmental chronic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Frank Willi Floeth; Gabriele Stoffels; Jörg Herdmann; Paul Jansen; Wolfgang Meyer; Hans-Jakob Steiger; Karl-Josef Langen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Predictors of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: focusing on the quantitative signal intensity.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Fan Tao Meng; Shuai Wang; Lin Feng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Correlation between diffusion tensor imaging parameters and clinical assessments in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy with and without high signal intensity.

Authors:  Y Liu; C Kong; L Cui; X Yuan; P Zhao; Y Zhang; Y Guan; X Chen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Multilevel oblique corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy preserves segmental motion.

Authors:  Ari George Chacko; Mathew Joseph; Mazda Keki Turel; Krishna Prabhu; Roy Thomas Daniel; K S Jacob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Risk factors for poor outcome of surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  J T Zhang; L F Wang; S Wang; J Li; Y Shen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Does the type of T2-weighted hyperintensity influence surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A review.

Authors:  Aditya Vedantam; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Is there a benefit to operating on patients (bedridden or in wheelchairs) with advanced stage cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Authors:  Fabrizio Borges Scardino; Leonardo Poubel Rocha; Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos; José Marcus Rotta; Ricardo Vieira Botelho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Compensatory cerebral adaptations before and evolving changes after surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yun Dong; Langston T Holly; Richard Albistegui-Dubois; Xiaohong Yan; Jonathan Marehbian; Jennifer M Newton; Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-12

10.  Single level cervical disc herniation: A questionnaire based study on current surgical practices.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Yousef Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Pouria Tavakoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.