Literature DB >> 20069318

Is there a benefit to operating on patients (bedridden or in wheelchairs) with advanced stage cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Fabrizio Borges Scardino1, Leonardo Poubel Rocha, Alécio Cristino Evangelista Santos Barcelos, José Marcus Rotta, Ricardo Vieira Botelho.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) aims to prevent or delay the progression of the disease. Many patients are diagnosed in advanced stages of the disease, presenting severe functional disability and extensive radiologic changes, which suggests clinical irreversibility. There are doubts about the real benefit of surgery in patients who are seriously ill, bedridden or in a wheelchair. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of surgical treatment in the clinical outcomes of patients severely affected by CSM. We analyzed patients with CSM who received an operation at a single institution between 1996 and 2008. Cases with a preoperative Nurick score equal to 5 were studied. We describe postoperative clinical improvement and compare the demographics and clinical data between the patients who improved and those who had no improvement. Radiological findings were also analyzed. We evaluated 55 patients operated on. Nine presented with preoperative Nurick score of 5 (16.3%). The mean age was 69.77 +/- 6.6 years (95% CI 64.65-79.90). The mean follow-up was 53.44 +/- 35.09 months (CI 26.46-80.42). Six patients (66.6%) achieved functional improvement when assessed by the Nurick scale, regaining the ability to walk. All patients improved on the JOAm scale, except one. The mean preoperative Nurick score was 5, while the mean postoperative Nurick score was 4.11 +/- 0.92 (95% CI 3.39-4.82) (Wilcoxon p = 0.027). The mean preoperative JOAm score was 6.4, and postoperative was 9.88 +/- 2.31 (CI 95% 8.10-11.66) (Wilcoxon p = 0.011). All spinal cords presented high-intensity signal on T2-weighted images. There was no correlation between the number of spinal cord high-intensity signal levels and clinical improvement. Three out of seven patients (whose image was adequate for analysis) had evident spinal cord atrophy, and two of them did not improve clinically. In the whole sample of patients, the mean length of disease for those who improved was 9.25 +/- 7.31 months (95% CI 1.56-16.93), and for those who did not improve was 38.00 +/- 19.28 months (95% CI 9.91-85.91) (Mann-Whitney p = 0.02). In conclusion, two-thirds of patients with CSM Nurick scores of 5 who were either bedridden or in wheelchairs at the time of diagnosis improved at least one degree on the Nurick scale after surgical treatment, thus returning to walking. The JOAm scale was more sensitive to clinical changes than the Nurick scale. Patients with longer lengths of disease had worse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20069318      PMCID: PMC2899963          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1267-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  E CLARKE; P K ROBINSON
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  T F Mehalic; R T Pezzuti; B I Applebaum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy and fibular allograft fusion for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  R L Macdonald; M G Fehlings; C H Tator; A Lozano; J R Fleming; F Gentili; M Bernstein; M C Wallace; R R Tasker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  S Nurick
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  L Symon; P Lavender
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: functional and radiographic long-term outcome after laminectomy and posterior fusion.

Authors:  V G Kumar; G L Rea; L J Mervis; J M McGregor
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  T Alafifi; R Kern; M Fehlings
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  E C Benzel; J Lancon; L Kesterson; T Hadden
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1991-09

9.  A comparative study of the treatment of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Experience with 50 cases treated by means of extensive laminectomy, foraminotomy, and excision of osteophytes during the past 10 years.

Authors:  J A Epstein; Y Janin; R Carras; L S Lavine
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The effect of surgical immobilization after laminectomy in the treatment of advanced cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  L González-Feria
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylosis in patients with or without a history of syringomyelia.

Authors:  Jörg Klekamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The effects of surgery on locomotion in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Go Yoshida; Tokumi Kanemura; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Zenya Ito; Ryoji Tauchi; Akio Muramoto; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long-term follow-up results of the Cloward procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Olimpio Galasso; Massimo Mariconda; Bruno Iannò; Marco De Gori; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Outcomes of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Very Severe Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Branko Kopjar; Parker E Bohm; Joshua H Arnold; Michael G Fehlings; Lindsay A Tetreault; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Length of MRI signal may predict outcome in advanced cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Amro F Al-Habib; Ahmed M AlAqeel; Abdulrahman S Aldakkan; Fahad B AlBadr; Shaffi A Shaik
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.906

10.  Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Multilevel Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: An Analysis of 184 Patients.

Authors:  Yifei Gu; Jueqian Shi; Peng Cao; Wen Yuan; Huiqiao Wu; Lili Yang; Ye Tian; Lei Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.