Literature DB >> 17894351

Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category.

Randy J Read1, Gayatri Chavali.   

Abstract

Models for target domains in the high accuracy template-based modeling category were assessed according to a number of criteria evaluating the quality of the main-chain prediction (GDT-HA), predicted sequence alignment (AL0), and side-chain rotameric state. A new criterion was introduced, the quality of the model for use in solving a crystal structure by molecular replacement. There is good evidence that modeling adds value to the template structures, particularly when multiple templates are available. However, when there is already a good template, few of the models are better for the purpose of molecular replacement. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17894351     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  47 in total

Review 1.  The evaluation of protein structure prediction results.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Alejandro Giorgetti; Domenico Raimondo; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Multiple sequence alignment by conformational space annealing.

Authors:  Keehyoung Joo; Jinwoo Lee; Ilsoo Kim; Sung Jong Lee; Jooyoung Lee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skolnick; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Comparison of structure-based and threading-based approaches to protein functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-01

5.  The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models.

Authors:  Daniel A Keedy; Christopher J Williams; Jeffrey J Headd; W Bryan Arendall; Vincent B Chen; Gary J Kapral; Robert A Gillespie; Jeremy N Block; Adam Zemla; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

6.  In silico prediction of prolactin molecules as a tool for equine genomics reproduction.

Authors:  A Neis; F S Kremer; L S Pinto; P M M Leon
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.943

7.  Success in the DREAM3 signaling response challenge using simple weighted-average imputation: lessons for community-wide experiments in systems biology.

Authors:  Neil D Clarke; Guillaume Bourque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

9.  The expanded FindCore method for identification of a core atom set for assessment of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Jennifer Grullon; Yuanpeng J Huang; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

10.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.