PURPOSE: To describe gene expression differences between healthy, young human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells from the macular area and RPE cells from two locations in the retinal periphery. METHODS: RPE cells from six human donor eyes, ages 17-36, without histopathological abnormalities, were dissected by laser and isolated from cryosections. Total RNA was isolated, amplified, and hybridized to a custom made oligonucleotide array containing 22,000 genes. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out using the computer programs Rosetta Resolver and the webtools EASE/David and GoStat. Confirmatory real time PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry were performed according to standard protocols. RESULTS: Microarray and statistical analysis yielded 438 genes that were differentially expressed between macular RPE, and at least one out of two peripheral RPE locations. Out of these genes, 33 that showed fold changes of four, or higher, were selected for RT-PCR confirmation. For 17 genes (51%), a significant differential expression was found, while 11 additional genes (33%) showed a similar trend. Immuno-staining of one target (WFDC1) confirmed its differential expression on the protein level. Functional annotation and overrepresentation analysis independently defined extracellular matrix (ECM) genes as a statistically overrepresented class of genes in our RPE dataset. In total, 33 ECM genes were differentially expressed between macular and peripheral RPE regions. A subset of proteins corresponding to these genes is known to be present in Bruch's membrane. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that consistent topographical gene expression differences in the human RPE constitute around 1-5% of the RPE transcriptome. These changes may underlie topographical differences in RPE physiology, and pathology and may reflect local differences in the molecular composition and turnover of Bruch's membrane.
PURPOSE: To describe gene expression differences between healthy, young human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells from the macular area and RPE cells from two locations in the retinal periphery. METHODS: RPE cells from six humandonor eyes, ages 17-36, without histopathological abnormalities, were dissected by laser and isolated from cryosections. Total RNA was isolated, amplified, and hybridized to a custom made oligonucleotide array containing 22,000 genes. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out using the computer programs Rosetta Resolver and the webtools EASE/David and GoStat. Confirmatory real time PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry were performed according to standard protocols. RESULTS: Microarray and statistical analysis yielded 438 genes that were differentially expressed between macular RPE, and at least one out of two peripheral RPE locations. Out of these genes, 33 that showed fold changes of four, or higher, were selected for RT-PCR confirmation. For 17 genes (51%), a significant differential expression was found, while 11 additional genes (33%) showed a similar trend. Immuno-staining of one target (WFDC1) confirmed its differential expression on the protein level. Functional annotation and overrepresentation analysis independently defined extracellular matrix (ECM) genes as a statistically overrepresented class of genes in our RPE dataset. In total, 33 ECM genes were differentially expressed between macular and peripheral RPE regions. A subset of proteins corresponding to these genes is known to be present in Bruch's membrane. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that consistent topographical gene expression differences in the human RPE constitute around 1-5% of the RPE transcriptome. These changes may underlie topographical differences in RPE physiology, and pathology and may reflect local differences in the molecular composition and turnover of Bruch's membrane.
Authors: Lifeng Tian; Krista L Kazmierkiewicz; Anita S Bowman; Mingyao Li; Christine A Curcio; Dwight E Stambolian Journal: Genomics Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 5.736
Authors: Abbas M Solouki; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Cornelia M van Duijn; Annemieke J M H Verkerk; M Kamran Ikram; Pirro G Hysi; Dominiek D G Despriet; Leonieke M van Koolwijk; Lintje Ho; Wishal D Ramdas; Monika Czudowska; Robert W A M Kuijpers; Najaf Amin; Maksim Struchalin; Yurii S Aulchenko; Gabriel van Rij; Frans C C Riemslag; Terri L Young; David A Mackey; Timothy D Spector; Theo G M F Gorgels; Jacqueline J M Willemse-Assink; Aaron Isaacs; Rogier Kramer; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Arthur A B Bergen; Andy A L J van Oosterhout; Ben A Oostra; Fernando Rivadeneira; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Paulus T V M de Jong; Christopher J Hammond; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-09-12 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: S Scott Whitmore; Alex H Wagner; Adam P DeLuca; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Shemin Zeng; Terry A Braun; Robert F Mullins; Todd E Scheetz Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Judith C Booij; Jacoline B ten Brink; Sigrid M A Swagemakers; Annemieke J M H Verkerk; Anke H W Essing; Peter J van der Spek; Arthur A B Bergen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dominique C Baas; Dominiek D Despriet; Theo G M F Gorgels; Julie Bergeron-Sawitzke; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Joanna E Merriam; R Theodore Smith; Gaetano R Barile; Jacoline B ten Brink; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Rando Allikmets; Michael Dean; Arthur A B Bergen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dominiek D G Despriet; Arthur A B Bergen; Joanna E Merriam; Jana Zernant; Gaetano R Barile; R Theodore Smith; Irene A Barbazetto; Simone van Soest; Arne Bakker; Paulus T V M de Jong; Rando Allikmets; Caroline C W Klaver Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Steven J Ressler; Truong D Dang; Samuel M Wu; Dennis Y Tse; Brian E Gilbert; Annapurna Vyakarnam; Feng Yang; Isaiah G Schauer; David A Barron; David R Rowley Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Peter Kozulin; Riccardo Natoli; Keely M Bumsted O'Brien; Michele C Madigan; Jan M Provis Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2009-01-12 Impact factor: 2.367