Yi Dong1, Ze-Dong Li1, Xin-Yu Fang2, Xue-Feng Shi3, Song Chen3, Xin Tang3. 1. Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China ; Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300020, China. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui Province, China. 3. Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300020, China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the association between SERPING1 rs2511989 (G>A) polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A number of electronic databases (up to July 15, 2014) were searched independently by two investigators. A Meta-analysis was performed on the association between SERPING1 rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: Eight studies with 16 cohorts consisting of 9163 cases and 6813 controls were included in this Meta-analysis. There was no significant association between rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD under all genetic models in overall estimates (A vs G: OR= 0.938, 95%CI =0.858-1.025; AA vs GG:OR =0.871, 95%CI =0.719-1.056; AG vs GG: OR =0.944, 95%CI =0.845-1.054; AA+AG vs GG: OR =0.927, 95% CI =0.823-1.044; AA vs AG+GG: OR =0.890, 95%CI =0.780-1.034). Cumulative Meta-analyses also showed a trend of no association between rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD as information accumulated by year. Subgroup analysis and Meta-regression analysis indicated that age-matching status was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis found the results in overall comparisons and subgroup comparisons of white subjects under the allele model were found to have significantly statistical differences after studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were excluded (overall: OR=0.918, 95%CI = 0.844-0.999, P =0.049; whites: OR =0.901, 95%CI = 0.817-0.994, P =0.038). However, the results were not sufficiently robust for further sensitivity analysis and statistical differences disappeared on applying Bonferroni correction (with a significance level set at 0.05/25). CONCLUSION: This Meta-analysis indicates that SERPING1 rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD tend to have no association with each other. Age matching status is a big confounding factor, and more studies with subtle designs are warranted in future.
AIM: To investigate the association between SERPING1rs2511989 (G>A) polymorphism and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A number of electronic databases (up to July 15, 2014) were searched independently by two investigators. A Meta-analysis was performed on the association between SERPING1rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: Eight studies with 16 cohorts consisting of 9163 cases and 6813 controls were included in this Meta-analysis. There was no significant association between rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD under all genetic models in overall estimates (A vs G: OR= 0.938, 95%CI =0.858-1.025; AA vs GG:OR =0.871, 95%CI =0.719-1.056; AG vs GG: OR =0.944, 95%CI =0.845-1.054; AA+AG vs GG: OR =0.927, 95% CI =0.823-1.044; AA vs AG+GG: OR =0.890, 95%CI =0.780-1.034). Cumulative Meta-analyses also showed a trend of no association between rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD as information accumulated by year. Subgroup analysis and Meta-regression analysis indicated that age-matching status was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis found the results in overall comparisons and subgroup comparisons of white subjects under the allele model were found to have significantly statistical differences after studies deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were excluded (overall: OR=0.918, 95%CI = 0.844-0.999, P =0.049; whites: OR =0.901, 95%CI = 0.817-0.994, P =0.038). However, the results were not sufficiently robust for further sensitivity analysis and statistical differences disappeared on applying Bonferroni correction (with a significance level set at 0.05/25). CONCLUSION: This Meta-analysis indicates that SERPING1rs2511989 polymorphism and AMD tend to have no association with each other. Age matching status is a big confounding factor, and more studies with subtle designs are warranted in future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Meta-analysis; SERPING1; age-related macular degeneration; single nucleotide polymorphism
Authors: Robert J Klein; Caroline Zeiss; Emily Y Chew; Jen-Yue Tsai; Richard S Sackler; Chad Haynes; Alice K Henning; John Paul SanGiovanni; Shrikant M Mane; Susan T Mayne; Michael B Bracken; Frederick L Ferris; Jurg Ott; Colin Barnstable; Josephine Hoh Journal: Science Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Rita P Middelberg; Beben Benyamin; Marleen H M de Moor; Nicole M Warrington; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Sarah E Medland; Dale R Nyholt; Eco J C de Geus; Jouke J Hottenga; Gonneke Willemsen; Lawrence J Beilin; Trevor A Mori; Margaret J Wright; Andrew C Heath; Pamela A F Madden; Dorret I Boomsma; Craig E Pennell; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin; John B Whitfield Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Lebriz Ersoy; Tina Ristau; Moritz Hahn; Marcus Karlstetter; Thomas Langmann; Katharina Dröge; Albert Caramoy; Anneke I den Hollander; Sascha Fauser Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Simone S van Soest; Gerard M J de Wit; Anke H W Essing; Jacoline B ten Brink; Willem Kamphuis; Paulus T V M de Jong; Arthur A B Bergen Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Sarah Ennis; Catherine Jomary; Robert Mullins; Angela Cree; Xiaoli Chen; Alex Macleod; Stephen Jones; Andrew Collins; Edwin Stone; Andrew Lotery Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-10-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Todd E Scheetz; John H Fingert; Kai Wang; Markus H Kuehn; Kevin L Knudtson; Wallace L M Alward; H Culver Boldt; Stephen R Russell; James C Folk; Thomas L Casavant; Terry A Braun; Abbot F Clark; Edwin M Stone; Val C Sheffield Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nathan G Lambert; Hanan ElShelmani; Malkit K Singh; Fiona C Mansergh; Michael A Wride; Maximilian Padilla; David Keegan; Ruth E Hogg; Balamurali K Ambati Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 21.198