Literature DB >> 17891625

Promoting older peoples' participation in activity, whose responsibility? A case study of the response of health, local government and voluntary organizations.

C Goodman1, S Davies, S See Tai, S Dinan, S Iliffe.   

Abstract

The benefits for older people of participating in regular activity are well documented. This paper focuses on how publicly funded community-based organizations enable older people to engage in physical activity. The research questions were: (i) What activity promotion schemes/initiatives exist for older people? (ii) Who has responsibility for them, how are they funded and organized and what evidence exists of interagency working? (iii) Who are the older people that participate? (iv) What are the perceived and measurable outcomes of the initiatives identified? To establish the type and range of provision for older people in a sector of London, the strategies and information about existing activity promoting schemes of inner city health, local government and voluntary organizations were reviewed. Key informants were then interviewed to establish the rationale, achievements and different schemes. One hundred and nine activity-promoting initiatives for older people were identified. Most were provided within an environment of short-term funding and organizational upheaval and reflected eclectic theoretical and ideological approaches. The findings demonstrate: (i) the need for organizations to apply evidence about what attracts and sustains older people's participation in physical activity, and (ii) the need to develop funded programmes that build on past achievements, have explicit outcomes and exploit opportunities for cross agency working.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17891625     DOI: 10.1080/13561820701637204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  3 in total

1.  A tale of two trails: exploring different paths to success.

Authors:  Jennifer G Walker; Kelly R Evenson; William J Davis; Philip Bors; Daniel A Rodríguez
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-05

2.  Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.

Authors:  Tess Harris; Sally Kerry; Christina Victor; Ulf Ekelund; Alison Woodcock; Steve Iliffe; Peter Whincup; Carole Beighton; Michael Ussher; Lee David; Debbie Brewin; Fredrika Adams; Annabelle Rogers; Derek Cook
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  PACE-UP (Pedometer and consultation evaluation--UP)--a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45-75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Tess Harris; Sally M Kerry; Christina R Victor; Sunil M Shah; Steve Iliffe; Michael Ussher; Ulf Ekelund; Julia Fox-Rushby; Peter Whincup; Lee David; Debbie Brewin; Judith Ibison; Stephen DeWilde; Elizabeth Limb; Nana Anokye; Cheryl Furness; Emma Howard; Rebecca Dale; Derek G Cook
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.