Literature DB >> 17889334

Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models.

Martin Roberts1, Tim Cootes, Elisa Pacheco, Judith Adams.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Current quantitative morphometric methods of vertebral fracture detection lack specificity, particularly with mild fractures. We use more detailed shape and texture information to develop quantitative classifiers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The detailed shape and appearance of vertebrae on 360 lateral dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were statistically modeled, thus producing a set of shape and appearance parameters for each vertebra. The vertebrae were given a "gold standard" classification using a consensus reading by two radiologists. Linear discriminants were trained on the vertebral shape and appearance parameters.
RESULTS: The appearance-based classifiers gave significantly better specificity than shape-based methods in all regions of the spine (overall specificity 92% at a sensitivity of 95%), while using the full shape parameters slightly improved specificity in the thoracic spine compared with using three standard height ratios. The main improvement was in the detection of mild fractures. Performance varied over different regions of the spine. False-positive rates at 95% sensitivity for the lumbar, mid-thoracic (T12-T10) and upper thoracic (T9-T7) regions were 2.9%, 14.6%, and 5.5%, respectively, compared with 6.4%, 32.6%, and 21.1% for three-height morphometry.
CONCLUSION: The appearance and shape parameters of statistical models could provide more powerful quantitative classifiers of osteoporotic vertebral fracture, particularly mild fractures. False positive rates can be substantially reduced at high sensitivity by using an appearance-based classifier, because this can better distinguish between mild fractures and some kinds of non-fracture shape deformities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889334     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

1.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: a comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; H K Genant; X Cheng; W Yu; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D.

Authors:  D Stern; V Njagulj; B Likar; F Pernuš; T Vrtovec
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Semi-automatic determination of detailed vertebral shape from lumbar radiographs using active appearance models.

Authors:  M G Roberts; T Oh; E M B Pacheco; R Mohankumar; T F Cootes; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation.

Authors:  M G Roberts; E M B Pacheco; R Mohankumar; T F Cootes; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  [Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].

Authors:  H Franck; J Braun; F Buttgereit; W Demary; G Hein; J Kekow; G Schett; P M Kern
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  Local topological analysis of densitometer-generated scan images of the proximal femur for differentiation between patients with hip fracture and age-matched controls.

Authors:  H F Boehm; J Lutz; A Horng; M Notohamiprodjo; A Panteleon; K-J Pfeifer; M Reiser
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Compression fracture diagnosis in lumbar: a clinical CAD system.

Authors:  Samah Al-Helo; Raja S Alomari; Subarna Ghosh; Vipin Chaudhary; Gurmeet Dhillon; Moh'd B Al-Zoubi; Hazem Hiary; Thair M Hamtini
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Statistical shape modelling of hip and lumbar spine morphology and their relationship in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Fiona R Saunders; Stella G Muthuri; Jennifer S Gregory; Rebecca J Barr; Kathryn R Martin; Rebecca J Hardy; Rachel Cooper; Judith E Adams; Diana Kuh; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.610

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.