Literature DB >> 17881544

Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed?

Andrew Lee1, Stanley Mirrett, L Barth Reller, Melvin P Weinstein.   

Abstract

Although several reports have shown that two to three 20-ml blood cultures are adequate for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia in adults, a recent study (F. R. Cockerill et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1724-1730, 2004) found that two blood cultures detected only 80% of bloodstream infections and that three blood cultures detected 96% of episodes. We reviewed data at two university hospitals to determine whether the recent observations by Cockerill et al. are applicable more widely. We assessed all blood cultures obtained from adult inpatients from 1 January 2004 through 31 December 2005 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital and Duke University Medical Center. All instances in which > or =3 blood cultures per patient were obtained during a 24-h period were included. The medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed retrospectively to determine the clinical significance of the positive blood culture (true infection versus contamination). Data were analyzed to determine the cumulative sensitivity of blood cultures obtained sequentially during the 24-h time period. Of 629 unimicrobial episodes with > or =3 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 460 (73.1%) were detected with the first blood culture, 564 (89.7%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 618 (98.2%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 628 (99.8%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Of 351 unimicrobial episodes with > or =4 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 257 (73.2%) were detected with the first blood culture, 308 (93.9%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 340 (96.9%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 350 (99.7%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Among unimicrobial episodes, Staphylococcus aureus was more likely to be detected with the first blood culture (approximately 90% detected with the first blood culture). There were 58 polymicrobial episodes in which > or =3 blood cultures were obtained. Forty-seven (81.0%) were detected with the first blood culture, 54 (93.1%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, and 58 (100%) were detected with the first three blood cultures. The results of this study indicate that two blood cultures in a 24-h period will detect approximately 90% of bloodstream infections in adults. To achieve a detection rate of >99%, as many as four blood cultures may be needed. The previously held axiom that virtually all bloodstream infections can be detected with two to three blood cultures may no longer be valid but may also depend on the definition of the "first" blood culture obtained (see Materials and Methods and Discussion in the text).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17881544      PMCID: PMC2168497          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01555-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: principles and techniques.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures.

Authors:  F R Cockerill; J W Wilson; E A Vetter; K M Goodman; C A Torgerson; W S Harmsen; C D Schleck; D M Ilstrup; J A Washington; W R Wilson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-05-25       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results.

Authors:  M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 4.  Clinical issues of blood cultures.

Authors:  P H Chandrasekar; W J Brown
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-25

5.  Clinical comparison of BACTEC 9240 plus aerobic/F resin bottles and the isolator aerobic culture system for detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  F R Cockerill; G S Reed; J G Hughes; C A Torgerson; E A Vetter; W S Harmsen; J C Dale; G D Roberts; D M Ilstrup; N K Henry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; L B Reller; J R Murphy; K A Lichtenstein
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

7.  Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections.

Authors:  J K Pohlman; B A Kirkley; K A Easley; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  7 in total
  116 in total

1.  L. Barth Reller, M.D.

Authors:  Gary V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Optimized pathogen detection with 30- compared to 20-milliliter blood culture draws.

Authors:  Robin Patel; Emily A Vetter; W Scott Harmsen; Cathy D Schleck; Hind J Fadel; Franklin R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Appropriateness of blood culture testing parameters in routine practice. Results from a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  V Vitrat-Hincky; P François; J Labarère; C Recule; J P Stahl; P Pavese
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  The diagnostic future for bloodstream infections?

Authors:  Paul Philip Dean; Paul Dark
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Assessing how many blood cultures are needed for detecting bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Federico G Nicola
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Biographical feature: Melvin P. Weinstein, M.D.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Current approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Patrick R Murray; Henry Masur
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Screening for bacteremia in sepsis and renal failure using hemofilters for renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  G P Otto; M Kropf; M Sossdorf; P Recknagel; W Lösche; J Rödel; R A Claus; M Busch
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Interference of antibiotic therapy on blood cultures time-to-positivity: analysis of a 5-year experience in an oncological hospital.

Authors:  R Passerini; D Riggio; D Radice; L Bava; C Cassatella; M Salvatici; L Zorzino; M T Sandri
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Comparison of PCR-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry with 16S rRNA PCR and Amplicon Sequencing for Detection of Bacteria in Excised Heart Valves.

Authors:  Bart Peeters; Paul Herijgers; Kurt Beuselinck; Willy E Peetermans; Marie-Christin Herregods; Stefanie Desmet; Katrien Lagrou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.