Literature DB >> 17879792

Helical tomotherapy superficial dose measurements.

Chester R Ramsey1, Rebecca M Seibert, Benjamin Robison, Martha Mitchell.   

Abstract

Helical tomotherapy is a treatment technique that is delivered from a 6 MV fan beam that traces a helical path while the couch moves linearly into the bore. In order to increase the treatment delivery dose rate, helical tomotherapy systems do not have a flattening filter. As such, the dose distributions near the surface of the patient may be considerably different from other forms of intensity-modulated delivery. The purpose of this study was to measure the dose distributions near the surface for helical tomotherapy plans with a varying separation between the target volume and the surface of an anthropomorphic phantom. A hypothetical planning target volume (PTV) was defined on an anthropomorphic head phantom to simulate a 2.0 Gy per fraction IMRT parotid-sparing head and neck treatment of the upper neck nodes. A total of six target volumes were created with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm of separation between the surface of the phantom and the outer edge of the PTV. Superficial doses were measured for each of the treatment deliveries using film placed in the head phantom and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) placed on the phantom's surface underneath an immobilization mask. In the 0 mm test case where the PTV extends to the phantom surface, the mean TLD dose was 1.73 +/- 0.10 Gy (or 86.6 +/- 5.1% of the prescribed dose). The measured superficial dose decreases to 1.23 +/- 0.10 Gy (61.5 +/- 5.1% of the prescribed dose) for a PTV-surface separation of 5 mm. The doses measured by the TLDs indicated that the tomotherapy treatment planning system overestimates superficial doses by 8.9 +/- 3.2%. The radiographic film dose for the 0 mm test case was 1.73 +/- 0.07 Gy, as compared to the calculated dose of 1.78 +/- 0.05 Gy. Given the results of the TLD and film measurements, the superficial calculated doses are overestimated between 3% and 13%. Without the use of bolus, tumor volumes that extend to the surface may be underdosed. As such, it is recommended that bolus be added for these clinical cases. For cases where the target volume is located 1 to 5 mm below the surface, the tumor volume coverage can be achieved with surface doses ranging from 56% to 93% of the prescribed dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879792     DOI: 10.1118/1.2757000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.

Authors:  Shu-Hui Hsu; Jean M Moran; Yu Chen; Ravi Kulasekere; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Skin dose study of chest wall treatment with tomotherapy.

Authors:  Khosrow Javedan; Geoffrey Zhang; Richard Mueller; Eleanor Harris; Lawrence Berk; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Erratum to: Molecular and cellular mechanisms that initiate pain and itch.

Authors:  Jialie Luo; Jing Feng; Shenbin Liu; Edgar T Walters; Hongzhen Hu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Acute Toxicity From Breast Cancer Radiation Using Helical Tomotherapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost.

Authors:  Andrzej P Wojcieszynski; Anna K Olson; Yi Rong; Randall J Kimple; Poonam Yadav
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  Evaluation of dose calculations accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system for the head and neck region in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Bagher Farhood; Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-08-18

6.  Surface dose in the treatment of breast cancer with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Felix Zibold; Florian Sterzing; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Kai Schubert; Katja Wagenknecht; Gerald Major; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Dosimetric comparison of three different treatment modalities for total scalp irradiation: the conventional lateral photon-electron technique, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Ji-Young Jung; Hyung-Wook Park; Gi Woong Lee; Soo-Min Chae; Chul Seung Kay; Seok Hyun Son
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Evaluation of skin dose associated with different frequencies of bolus applications in post-mastectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Fundagul Andic; Yasemin Ors; Rima Davutoglu; Sule Baz Cifci; Emine Burcin Ispir; Mehmet Ertugrul Erturk
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-24

9.  Identification of Biologically Effective Dose-Volumetric Parameters That Predict Radiation-Induced Hepatic Toxicity in Patients Treated With Helical Tomotherapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Seok Hyun Son; Chul Seung Kay; Hong Seok Jang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Evaluation of six TPS algorithms in computing entrance and exit doses.

Authors:  Yun I Tan; Mohamed Metwaly; Martin Glegg; Shaun Baggarley; Alex Elliott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.