Literature DB >> 17879784

Dynamic-MLC leaf control utilizing on-flight intensity calculations: a robust method for real-time IMRT delivery over moving rigid targets.

Ryan McMahon1, Lech Papiez, Dharanipathy Rangaraj.   

Abstract

An algorithm is presented that allows for the control of multileaf collimation (MLC) leaves based entirely on real-time calculations of the intensity delivered over the target. The algorithm is capable of efficiently correcting generalized delivery errors without requiring the interruption of delivery (self-correcting trajectories), where a generalized delivery error represents anything that causes a discrepancy between the delivered and intended intensity profiles. The intensity actually delivered over the target is continually compared to its intended value. For each pair of leaves, these comparisons are used to guide the control of the following leaf and keep this discrepancy below a user-specified value. To demonstrate the basic principles of the algorithm, results of corrected delivery are shown for a leading leaf positional error during dynamic-MLC (DMLC) IMRT delivery over a rigid moving target. It is then shown that, with slight modifications, the algorithm can be used to track moving targets in real time. The primary results of this article indicate that the algorithm is capable of accurately delivering DMLC IMRT over a rigid moving target whose motion is (1) completely unknown prior to delivery and (2) not faster than the maximum MLC leaf velocity over extended periods of time. These capabilities are demonstrated for clinically derived intensity profiles and actual tumor motion data, including situations when the target moves in some instances faster than the maximum admissible MLC leaf velocity. The results show that using the algorithm while calculating the delivered intensity every 50 ms will provide a good level of accuracy when delivering IMRT over a rigid moving target translating along the direction of MLC leaf travel. When the maximum velocities of the MLC leaves and target were 4 and 4.2 cm/s, respectively, the resulting error in the two intensity profiles used was 0.1 +/- 3.1% and -0.5 +/- 2.8% relative to the maximum of the intensity profiles. For the same target motion, the error was shown to increase rapidly as (1) the maximum MLC leaf velocity was reduced below 75% of the maximum target velocity and (2) the system response time was increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879784     DOI: 10.1118/1.2750964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  The dosimetric impact of inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plan modulation for real-time dynamic MLC tracking delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Larsson; Paul Keall; Byung Chul Cho; Marianne Aznar; Stine Korreman; Per Poulsen; Per Munck Af Rosenschold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Use of dMLC for implementation of dynamic respiratory-gated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eric W Pepin; Huanmei Wu; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Management of three-dimensional intrafraction motion through real-time DMLC tracking.

Authors:  Amit Sawant; Raghu Venkat; Vikram Srivastava; David Carlson; Sergey Povzner; Herb Cattell; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Real-time dynamic MLC tracking for inversely optimized arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Paul Keall; Herbert Cattell; Byung Chul Cho; Per Poulsen; Sergey Povzner; Amit Sawant; Jens Zimmerman; Stine Korreman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Synchronized moving aperture radiation therapy (SMART): superimposing tumor motion on IMRT MLC leaf sequences under realistic delivery conditions.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Nikos Papanikolaou; Chengyu Shi; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Motion management during IMAT treatment of mobile lung tumors--a comparison of MLC tracking and gated delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Pommer; Paul Keall; Stine Korreman; Gitte Persson; Per Poulsen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A deliverable four-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-planning method for dynamic multileaf collimator tumor tracking delivery.

Authors:  Yelin Suh; Elisabeth Weiss; Hualiang Zhong; Mirek Fatyga; Jeffrey V Siebers; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Development and performance evaluation of a high-speed multileaf collimator.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Peiqing Ye; Hui Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 9.  Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; Arpita Agarwal; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.