Literature DB >> 17879307

Identification and prediction of transitional vertebrae on imaging studies: anatomical significance of paraspinal structures.

Chang Hee Lee1, Cheol Min Park, Kyeong Ah Kim, Suk Joo Hong, Hae Young Seol, Baek Hyun Kim, Jung Hyuk Kim.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to examine the locational distribution of paraspinal structures on MRI and to determine any predictable parameters that may be used for the identification of transitional vertebra (TV). We enrolled 534 patients who underwent MRI of their lumbosacral spine. The locations of the paraspinal structures, such as aortic bifurcation (AB), IVC confluence (IC), right renal artery (RRA), celiac trunk (CT), SMA root (SR), and iliolumbar ligament (ILL), were determined using "cross link" in PACS. We also assessed the morphology of the TV. The MRI showed that the most common site of the paraspinal structures in the normal group was AB at the lower L4, IC at the L4-5 disc space, RRA at the L1-2 disc space, CT at the T12-L1 disc space, SR at the upper L1, and ILL at the L5. The frequency of TV was 23.8% (lumbarization, 9.9%; sacralization, 13.9%). The paraspinal structures of the S1 lumbarization were positioned more toward the caudal location, whereas the paraspinal structures of the L5 sacralization were positioned more toward the cephalic location (P < 0.01). In conclusion, AB, IC, RRA, CT, SR, and ILL are useful landmarks for predicting the presence of TV on MRI. TV is possible when these paraspinal structures are in positions outside of the frequent locations. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879307     DOI: 10.1002/ca.20540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  17 in total

1.  [Bony space-occupying lesion at the lumbosacral junction with malignant primary disease].

Authors:  K Lutz; F L Giesel; C M Zechmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Transition anomalies at the lumbosacral junctions.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Chiropractic management of a patient with low back pain and Castellvi type II lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2012-12

4.  Author reply.

Authors:  Anneli M Du Plessis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  François Ropars; J Mesrar; J Ognard; S Querellou; J Rousset; M Garetier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  A Review of Symptomatic Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Bertolotti's Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Jancuska; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-29

7.  Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies?

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Brett Lurie; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Merits of different anatomical landmarks for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in lumbosacral transitional anomalies.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Alexander Aichmair; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Implications of structural variations in the human sacrum: why is an anatomical classification crucial?

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Partial lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: 2 cases of unilateral sacralization.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2012-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.