Literature DB >> 30413962

Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine.

François Ropars1, J Mesrar2, J Ognard2, S Querellou3, J Rousset4, M Garetier4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of psoas muscle proximal insertion for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in MRI, in particular in case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV).
METHODS: Two radiologists assessed 477 MRI scans of the lumbar spine with a sagittal localizer sequence on the whole spine for numbering vertebrae caudally from C2. Proximal insertion of the psoas was determined as the most proximal vertebra with psoas over half of its body on coronal T2 STIR sequence. The last lumbar vertebra was named considering both its number and the presence or absence of LSTV according to Castellvi classification. These same parameters were also assessed on 207 PET-CT scans of another cohort including the whole spine.
RESULTS: Proximal insertion of the psoas was L1 in 94.1% of cases: 98.5% in case of modal anatomy, 81.4% in case of LSTV, and 51.7% in case of missing or supernumerary lumbar vertebra without LSTV. There was no statistically significant difference between MRI and CT data. The inter-reader agreement for determination of psoas proximal insertion was excellent (kappa = 0.96).
CONCLUSION: Proximal insertion of the psoas muscle is a helpful marker for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in MRI and to detect a complete lumbosacral segmentation anomaly. KEY POINTS: • Proximal insertion of the psoas muscle can be easily identified on a coronal T2 STIR sequence. • Psoas proximal insertion on the spine almost always designates the first lumbar vertebra and is helpful to accurately number all lumbar vertebrae, especially in case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra. • Conversely, when psoas muscle does not insert five lumbar bodies above the apparent lumbosacral joint, the probability of variation in the number of lumbar vertebrae is high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar vertebrae; Lumbosacral region; Magnetic resonance imaging; Psoas muscle

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30413962     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5798-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  24 in total

1.  The prevalence of transitional vertebrae in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Alexios Apazidis; Pedro A Ricart; Christopher M Diefenbach; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Identification and prediction of transitional vertebrae on imaging studies: anatomical significance of paraspinal structures.

Authors:  Chang Hee Lee; Cheol Min Park; Kyeong Ah Kim; Suk Joo Hong; Hae Young Seol; Baek Hyun Kim; Jung Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies?

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Brett Lurie; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography.

Authors:  C M O'Driscoll; A Irwin; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Rapid MRI detection of vertebral numeric variation.

Authors:  Jason J Akbar; Kenneth L Weiss; Muhammad A Saafir; Jane L Weiss
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Lumbosacral transitional segments: classification, prevalence, and effect on disk height.

Authors:  C Y Hsieh; J D Vanderford; S R Moreau; T Prong
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome.

Authors:  Gerard A Malanga; Paul M Cooke
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Numeric and morphological verification of lumbosacral segments in 8280 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Nam Chull Paik; Chun Soo Lim; Ho Suk Jang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Low-back pain and disk degeneration in children: a case-control MR imaging study.

Authors:  M O Tertti; J J Salminen; H E Paajanen; P H Terho; M J Kormano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The prevalence of morphological changes in the thoracolumbar spine on whole-spine computed tomographic images.

Authors:  Aya Nakajima; Akihito Usui; Yoshiyuki Hosokai; Yusuke Kawasumi; Kenta Abiko; Masato Funayama; Haruo Saito
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-09-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative measurements at the lumbosacral junction are more reliable parameters for identifying and numbering lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

Authors:  Suying Zhou; Lin Du; Xin Liu; Qiqi Wang; Jie Zhao; Yuchan Lv; Haitao Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  Extra-articular Portion of the Sacroiliac Joint-Between the Sacral and Pelvic Tuberosities: An Anatomical Guide for the S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Trajectory.

Authors:  Yasunori Tatara; Takanori Niimura; Tatsuhiro Sekiya; Hisanori Mihara
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-02-03

3.  Changes in Lumbosacral Anatomy and Vertebral Numbering in Patients with Thoracolumbar and/or Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae.

Authors:  Yasunori Tatara; Takanori Niimura; Tatsuhiro Sekiya; Hisanori Mihara
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.