Literature DB >> 25223429

Merits of different anatomical landmarks for correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in lumbosacral transitional anomalies.

Nadja A Farshad-Amacker1, Alexander Aichmair, Richard J Herzog, Mazda Farshad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anatomical landmarks and their relation to the lumbar vertebrae are well described in subjects with normal spine anatomy, but not for subjects with lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV), in whom correct numbering of the vertebrae is challenging and can lead to wrong-level treatment. The aim of this study was to quantify the value of different anatomical landmarks for correct identification of the lumbar vertebra level in subjects with LSTV.
METHODS: After IRB approval, 71 subjects (57 ± 17 years) with and 62 without LSTV (57 ± 17 years), all with imaging studies that allowed correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae by counting down from C2 (n = 118) or T1 (n = 15) were included. Commonly used anatomical landmarks (ribs, aortic bifurcation (AB), right renal artery (RRA) and iliac crest height) were documented to determine the ability to correctly number the lumbar vertebrae. Further, a tangent to the top of the iliac crests was drawn on coronal MRI images by two blinded, independent readers and named the 'iliac crest tangent sign'. The sensitivity, specificity and the interreader agreement were calculated.
RESULTS: While the level of the AB and the RRA were found to be unreliable in correct numbering of the lumbar vertebrae in LSTV subjects, the iliac crest tangent sign had a sensitivity and specificity of 81 % and 64-88 %, respectively, with an interreader agreement of k = 0.75.
CONCLUSION: While anatomical landmarks are not always reliable, the 'iliac crest tangent sign' can be used without advanced knowledge in MRI to most accurately number the vertebrae in subjects with LSTV, if only a lumbar spine MRI is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25223429     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3573-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Using MRI to evaluate anatomic significance of aortic bifurcation, right renal artery, and conus medullaris when locating lumbar vertebral segments.

Authors:  Chang Hee Lee; Bo Kyoung Seo; Young Chil Choi; Hyun Joon Shin; Jeong Hee Park; Hae Jeong Jeon; Kyeong Ah Kim; Cheol Min Park; Baek Hyun Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Numbering of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on MRI: role of the iliolumbar ligaments.

Authors:  Richard J Hughes; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Interreader and intermodality reliability of standard anteroposterior radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging in detection and classification of lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Brett Lurie; Richard J Herzog; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging.

Authors:  John A Carrino; Paul D Campbell; Dennis C Lin; William B Morrison; Mark E Schweitzer; Adam E Flanders; John Eng; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions.

Authors:  R E Wigh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography.

Authors:  C M O'Driscoll; A Irwin; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  A reliable measurement for identifying a lumbosacral transitional vertebra with a solid bony bridge on a single-slice midsagittal MRI or plain lateral radiograph.

Authors:  M Farshad; A Aichmair; A P Hughes; R J Herzog; N A Farshad-Amacker
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Rapid MRI detection of vertebral numeric variation.

Authors:  Jason J Akbar; Kenneth L Weiss; Muhammad A Saafir; Jane L Weiss
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Transitional lumbosacral discs. probability of herniation.

Authors:  R E Wigh; H F Anthony
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Sagittal whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging in 750 consecutive outpatients: accurate determination of the number of lumbar vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Eric H Hanson; Rahul K Mishra; David S Chang; Thomas G Perkins; Daniel R Bonifield; Richard D Tandy; Peter E Cartwright; Randal R Peoples; William W Orrison
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-01
View more
  13 in total

1.  Thoracolumbar junction: morphologic characteristics, various variants and significance.

Authors:  Se K Park; Jung G Park; Beom S Kim; Jin D Huh; Hee Kang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Localizing the L5 Vertebra Using Nerve Morphology on MRI: An Accurate and Reliable Technique.

Authors:  M E Peckham; T A Hutchins; S E Stilwill; M K Mills; B J Morrissey; E A R Joiner; R K Sanders; G J Stoddard; L M Shah
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Psoas proximal insertion as a simple and reliable landmark for numbering lumbar vertebrae on MRI of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  François Ropars; J Mesrar; J Ognard; S Querellou; J Rousset; M Garetier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  A review of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and associated vertebral numeration.

Authors:  Jayson Lian; Nicole Levine; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Inter- and intra-observer variability of an anatomical landmark-based, manual segmentation method by MRI for the assessment of skeletal muscle fat content and area in subjects from the general population.

Authors:  Lena Sophie Kiefer; Jana Fabian; Roberto Lorbeer; Jürgen Machann; Corinna Storz; Mareen Sarah Kraus; Elke Wintermeyer; Christopher Schlett; Frank Roemer; Konstantin Nikolaou; Annette Peters; Fabian Bamberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  The value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the study of spinal disorders.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Antonio Jesús Láinez Ramos-Bossini; Yì Xiáng J Wáng; José Pablo Martínez Barbero; Jade García Espinosa; Alberto Martínez Martínez
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-07

7.  If you look this way, you will see it: cranial shift in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kadir Abul; Berk Barış Özmen; Altuğ Yücekul; Tais Zulemyan; Çağlar Yılgör; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-03

8.  Quantitative measurements at the lumbosacral junction are more reliable parameters for identifying and numbering lumbosacral transitional vertebrae.

Authors:  Suying Zhou; Lin Du; Xin Liu; Qiqi Wang; Jie Zhao; Yuchan Lv; Haitao Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 7.034

9.  Manually defining regions of interest when quantifying paravertebral muscles fatty infiltration from axial magnetic resonance imaging: a proposed method for the lumbar spine with anatomical cross-reference.

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca Abbott; James M Elliott
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Role of Anatomical Landmarks in Identifying Normal and Transitional Vertebra in Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Devimeenal Jagannathan; Venkatraman Indiran; Fouzal Hithaya; M Alamelu; S Padmanaban
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.