Literature DB >> 17877270

Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level.

Dong-Hyuk Park1, Prem Ramakrishnan, Tai-Hyoung Cho, Eric Lorenz, Jason C Eck, S Craig Humphreys, Tae-Hong Lim.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Symptomatic multisegment disease is most common at the C5-6 and C6-7 levels, and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is performed most often at these levels. Therefore, it may be clinically important to know whether a C5-7 fusion affects the superior C4-5 segment. A biomechanical study was carried out using cadaveric cervical spine specimens to determine the effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on intradiscal pressure and segmental motion at the superior adjacent vertebral level.
METHODS: Five cadaveric cervical spine specimens were used in this study. The specimens were stabilized at T-1 and loaded at C-3 to 15 degrees flexion, 10 degrees extension, and 10 degrees lateral bending before and after simulated two-level ACDF with plate placement at C5-7. Intradiscal pressure was recorded at the C4-5 level, and segmental motion was recorded from C-4 through C-7. Differences in mean intradiscal pressures were calculated and analyzed using a paired Student t-test. When the maximum calibrated intradiscal pressures were exceeded ("overshot") during measurements, data from the specimens involved were analyzed using the motion data with a Student t-test. Values for pressure and motion obtained before and after simulated ACDF were compared.
RESULTS: During flexion, the mean intradiscal pressure changes (+/- standard deviations) in the pre- and post-ACDF measurements were 1275 (+/- 225) mm Hg and 2475 (+/- 75) mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.05). When the results of pre-ACDF testing were compared with post-ACDF results, no significant difference was found in the mean changes in the intradiscal pressure during extension and lateral bending. The maximum calibrated intradiscal pressures were exceeded during the post-ACDF testing in four specimens in extension, three in flexion, and two in lateral bending. Comparison of pre- and post-ACDF data for all five specimens revealed significant differences in motion and intradiscal pressure (p < 0.05) during flexion, significant differences in motion (p < 0.05) but not in intradiscal pressure during extension, and significant differences in intradiscal pressure changes (p < 0.05) but not in motion during lateral bending.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulated C5-7 ACDF caused a significant increase in intradiscal pressure and segmental motion in the superior adjacent C4-5 level during physiological motion. The increased pressure and hypermobility might accelerate normal degenerative changes in the vertebral levels adjacent to the anterior cervical fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17877270     DOI: 10.3171/SPI-07/09/336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  33 in total

1.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sadayoshi Watanabe; Nozomu Inoue; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Yoshitaka Hirano; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shintaro Nishida; Yuichi Hirose; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Load sharing mechanism across graft-bone interface in static cervical locking plate fixation.

Authors:  In Ho Han; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Byung Ho Jin; Yong Eun Cho; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-04-30

3.  Cervical canal stenosis and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jing Tao Zhang; Jun Ming Cao; Fan Tao Meng; Yong Shen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Zhiwei Jia; Zhongjun Mo; Fan Ding; Qing He; Yubo Fan; Dike Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Hybrid surgery of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease : review of literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Sang-Bok Lee; Kyoung-Suok Cho; Jong-Youn Kim; Do-Sung Yoo; Tae-Gyu Lee; Pil-Woo Huh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-11-30

Review 6.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors:  Moon Soo Park; Michael P Kelly; Dong-Ho Lee; Woo-Kie Min; Ra'Kerry K Rahman; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Zhongjun Mo; Qi Li; Zhiwei Jia; Jiemeng Yang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; Todd H Lanman; J Kenneth Burkus; Scott D Hodges; Jeffrey R McConnell; Randall F Dryer; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12-31

10.  Activ C cervical disc replacement for myelopathy.

Authors:  L McGonagle; S Cadman; S D Chitgopkar; L Canavan; M O'Malley; I M Shackleford
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.