Literature DB >> 17876570

High-field, high-resolution, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: improved image quality by addition of contrast agent and higher field strength in patients with brain tumors.

K Pinker1, I M Noebauer-Huhmann, I Stavrou, R Hoeftberger, P Szomolanyi, M Weber, A Stadlbauer, G Grabner, E Knosp, S Trattnig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To demonstrate intratumoral susceptibility effects in malignant brain tumors and to assess visualization of susceptibility effects before and after administration of the paramagnetic contrast agent MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine; Bracco Imaging), an agent known to have high relaxivity, with respect to susceptibility effects, image quality, and reduction of scan time.
METHODS: Included in the study were 19 patients with malignant brain tumors who underwent high-resolution, susceptibility-weighted (SW) MR imaging at 3 T before and after administration of contrast agent. In all patients, Multihance was administered intravenously as a bolus (0.1 mmol/kg body weight). MR images were individually evaluated by two radiologists with previous experience in the evaluation of pre- and postcontrast 3-T SW MR images with respect to susceptibility effects, image quality, and reduction of scan time.
RESULTS: In the 19 patients 21 tumors were diagnosed, of which 18 demonstrated intralesional susceptibility effects both in pre- and postcontrast SW images, and 19 demonstrated contrast enhancement in both SW images and T1-weighted spin-echo MR images. Conspicuity of susceptibility effects and image quality were improved in postcontrast images compared with precontrast images and the scan time was also reduced due to decreased TE values from 9 min (precontrast) to 7 min (postcontrast).
CONCLUSION: The intravenous administration of MultiHance, an agent with high relaxivity, allowed a reduction of scan time from 9 min to 7 min while preserving excellent susceptibility effects and image quality in SW images obtained at 3 T. Contrast enhancement and intralesional susceptibility effects can be assessed in one sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876570     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0298-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  12 in total

1.  High-resolution BOLD venographic imaging: a window into brain function.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; E M Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  High-resolution blood oxygen-level dependent MR venography (HRBV): a new technique.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; L Jonetz-Mentzel; C Fitzek; E M Haacke; D K Kido; B C Lee; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Clinical applications of neuroimaging with susceptibility-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging to visualize blood products and improve tumor contrast in the study of brain masses.

Authors:  Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; Djamel Haddar; E Mark Haacke; Andrew E Sloan; Lucia J Zamorano; Geoffery Barger; Jiani Hu; Yingbiao Xu; Karthik Praveen Prabhakaran; Ilaya R Elangovan; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Contrast-enhanced, high-resolution, susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: dose-dependent optimization at 3 tesla and 1.5 tesla in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann; Katja Pinker; Markus Barth; Vladimir Mlynarik; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Walter F Saringer; Michael Weber; Thomas Benesch; Stephan Witoszynskyj; Alexander Rauscher; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Gliomas: correlation of magnetic susceptibility artifact with histologic grade.

Authors:  L J Bagley; R I Grossman; K D Judy; M Curtis; L A Loevner; M Polansky; J Detre
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Vladimir Mlynarik; Markus Barth; Alexander Schöggl; Karl Heimberger; Christian Matula; Amura Fog; Alexandra Kaider; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  MRI enhancement and microvascular density in gliomas. Correlation with tumor cell proliferation.

Authors:  O Tynninen; H J Aronen; M Ruhala; A Paetau; K Von Boguslawski; O Salonen; J Jääskeläinen; T Paavonen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  High-resolution three-dimensional contrast-enhanced blood oxygenation level-dependent magnetic resonance venography of brain tumors at 3 Tesla: first clinical experience and comparison with 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Markus Barth; Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Vladimir Mlynárik; Andreas Schöggl; Christian Matula; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  High-resolution venography of the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J R Reichenbach; M Essig; E M Haacke; B C Lee; C Przetak; W A Kaiser; L R Schad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.533

View more
  11 in total

1.  Combining atlas-based parcellation of regional brain data acquired across scanners at 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths.

Authors:  Adolf Pfefferbaum; Torsten Rohlfing; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Peripheral arterial wall imaging using contrast-enhanced, susceptibility-weighted phase imaging.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Zhaoyang Fan; Qi Yang; Debiao Li
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Evaluation of the anatomy and variants of internal cerebral veins with phase-sensitive MR imaging.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Jiawei Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Xiangyang Gong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Distinguishing recurrent primary brain tumor from radiation injury: a preliminary study using a susceptibility-weighted MR imaging-guided apparent diffusion coefficient analysis strategy.

Authors:  A Al Sayyari; R Buckley; C McHenery; K Pannek; A Coulthard; S Rose
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Precontrast and postcontrast susceptibility-weighted imaging in the assessment of intracranial brain neoplasms at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Masaaki Hori; Keiichi Ishigame; Hiroyuki Kabasawa; Hiroshi Kumagai; Satoshi Ikenaga; Nobuyuki Shiraga; Shigeki Aoki; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Combination of high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient: added value to brain tumour imaging and clinical feasibility of non-contrast MRI at 3 T.

Authors:  S M Park; H S Kim; G-H Jahng; C-W Ryu; S Y Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Early experience of pre- and post-contrast 7.0T MRI in brain tumors.

Authors:  Seung Leal Paek; Young Seob Chung; Sun Ha Paek; Jae Ha Hwang; Chul-Ho Sohn; Seung Hong Choi; Young Don Son; Young Bo Kim; Dong Gyu Kim; Kendall H Lee; Zang-Hee Cho
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between blood depositions and calcifications in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Andreas Deistung; Ferdinand Schweser; Benedikt Wiestler; Mario Abello; Matthias Roethke; Felix Sahm; Wolfgang Wick; Armin Michael Nagel; Sabine Heiland; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Martin Bendszus; Jürgen Rainer Reichenbach; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical applications of susceptibility-weighted imaging in detecting and grading intracranial gliomas: a review.

Authors:  Wasif Mohammed; Hong Xunning; Shi Haibin; Meng Jingzhi
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  An attempt toward objective assessment of brain tumor vascularization using susceptibility weighted imaging and dedicated computer program - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Julia Wieczorek-Pastusiak; Marek Kociński; Marek Raźniewski; Michał Strzelecki; Ludomir Stefańczyk; Agata Majos
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.