Literature DB >> 1787515

Resource allocation: idealism, realism, pragmatism, openness.

N W Goodman1.   

Abstract

Lewis and Charny have come under siege for suggesting remote questioning to decide appropriate medical care. While the criticisms are theoretically valid, the idea is so important practically that Lewis and Charny should be supported and their approach investigated as a way of making medical treatment at least more open and possibly more fair.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service

Mesh：

Year:  1991        PMID： 1787515      PMCID： PMC1376051          DOI： 10.1136/jme.17.4.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  Priorities in health care: reply to Lewis and Charny.

Authors:  David Lamb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A plea for a touch of idealism: reply to P Whitaker.

Authors:  D Lamb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Resource allocation: whose realism?

Authors:  P A Lewis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The global distribution of health care resources.

Authors:  R Attfield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Resource allocation: a plea for a touch of realism.

Authors:  P Whitaker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Priority setting: lessons from Oregon.

Authors:  J Dixon; H G Welch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Health care tickets for the uninsured. First class, coach, or standby?

Authors:  H G Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Terminating treatment: age as a standard.

Authors:  D Callahan
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.683
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Resource allocation--what is the first priority?

Authors:  L V Katekar
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Good quality quality? Some methodological issues.

Authors:  C E Selai; R M Rosser
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.344
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.