Literature DB >> 11644371

Priorities in health care: reply to Lewis and Charny.

David Lamb.   

Abstract

This paper is a reply to proposals to base priority health-care decisions on public opinion surveys. Whilst it is recognised that current practice is less than satisfactory, it is argued here that basing health-care priorities on societal attitudes in this way is not a solution and does not provide a satisfactory basis for bringing democracy to the health service.

Keywords:  Cardiff Health Survey; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 11644371      PMCID： PMC1375760          DOI： 10.1136/jme.15.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  6 in total

1.  A plea for a touch of idealism: reply to P Whitaker.

Authors:  D Lamb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Resource allocation: whose realism?

Authors:  P A Lewis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Resource allocation: a plea for a touch of realism.

Authors:  P Whitaker
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Resource allocation: idealism, realism, pragmatism, openness.

Authors:  N W Goodman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Choosing between cancer patients.

Authors:  B A Stoll
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  How can hospitals ration drugs? Drug rationing in a teaching hospital: a method to assign priorities. Drug Committee of the Royal Adelaide Hospital.

Authors:  F Bochner; E D Martin; N G Burgess; A A Somogyi; G M Misan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-04-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.