Literature DB >> 17868811

Speckle-tracking radial strain reveals left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing.

Laurens F Tops1, Matthew S Suffoletto, Gabe B Bleeker, Eric Boersma, Ernst E van der Wall, John Gorcsan, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Speckle-tracking strain analysis was used to assess the effects of permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing on the heterogeneity in timing of regional wall strain and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown detrimental effects of RV pacing, possibly related to the induction of LV dyssynchrony.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients treated with His bundle ablation and pacemaker implantation were studied. To assess the effect of RV pacing on time-to-peak radial strain of different LV segments, we applied speckle-tracking analysis to standard LV short-axis images. In addition, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, LV volumes, and systolic function were assessed at baseline and after long-term RV pacing.
RESULTS: At baseline, similar time-to-peak strain for the 6 segments was observed (mean 371 +/- 114 ms). In contrast, after a mean of 3.8 +/- 2.0 years of RV pacing, there was a marked heterogeneity in time-to-peak strain of the 6 segments. In 33 patients (57%), LV dyssynchrony, represented by a time difference > or =130 ms between the time-to-peak strain of the (antero)septal and the posterolateral segments, was present. In these patients, a deterioration of LV systolic function and NYHA functional class was observed. In 11 patients, an "upgrade" of the conventional pacemaker to a biventricular pacemaker resulted in partial reversal of the detrimental effects of RV pacing.
CONCLUSIONS: Speckle-tracking analysis revealed that permanent RV pacing induced heterogeneity in time-to-peak strain, resulting in LV dyssynchrony in 57% of patients, associated with deterioration of LV systolic function and NYHA functional class. Biventricular pacing may reverse these adverse effects of RV pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868811     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  35 in total

Review 1.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: still a dilemma?

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Rimbas Sisu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  Is speckle tracking actually helpful for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Authors:  Hidekazu Tanaka; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 4.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

5.  Selective site pacing: rationale and practical application.

Authors:  Sameer Parekh; Kenneth M Stein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Right ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: analysis of right ventricular myocardial relaxation using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging.

Authors:  Sanae Kaga; Taisei Mikami; Hisao Onozuka; Satomi Omotehara; Ayumu Abe; Satoshi Yamada; Masako Okada; Hiroshi Komatsu; Mamiko Inoue; Shinobu Yokoyama; Mutsumi Nishida; Chikara Shimizu; Kazuhiko Matsuno; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-05-21

Review 8.  His Bundle Pacing: Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; the importance of evaluating cardiac metabolism.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; A van der Laarse; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; evaluation by advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; M J Schalij; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.