| Literature DB >> 1786624 |
G van der Groen1, I Van Kerckhoven, G Vercauteren, P Piot.
Abstract
The conventional approach to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody testing, which relies on confirmation of all initially positive screening results using a Western blot assay, is expensive. In an alternative approach, we retested sera that were positive in an initial screening assay using a second screening assay, which differed from the first, and limited the use of Western blot to those sera that gave discrepant results in the two screening assays. This resulted in 100% sensitivity and specificity at a cost that was, on average, 6.1 times less than that of the conventional approach. This level of sensitivity and specificity was also achieved at a cost that was 9.0 times less than the conventional approach if the Western blot was replaced by a third screening assay that differed from the previous two. Retesting positive sera using the same assay did not increase the accuracy of the results obtained by testing the sera only once.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Americas; Belgium; Comparative Studies; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Diseases; Error Sources; Europe; Examinations And Diagnoses; False Negative Reactions; False Positive Reactions; Hematologic Tests; Hiv Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Laboratory Procedures; Measurement; Methodological Studies; Research Methodology; South America; Studies; Viral Diseases; Western Europe
Mesh:
Year: 1991 PMID: 1786624 PMCID: PMC2393319
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull World Health Organ ISSN: 0042-9686 Impact factor: 9.408