Literature DB >> 1785921

Characterization of metabolic performance of methanogenic granules treating brewery wastewater: role of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

W M Wu1, R F Hickey, J G Zeikus.   

Abstract

Granules from an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket system treating a brewery wastewater that contained mainly ethanol, propionate, and acetate as carbon sources and sulfate (0.6 to 1.0 mM) were characterized for their physical and chemical properties, metabolic performance on various substrates, and microbial composition. Transmission electron microscopic examination showed that at least three types of microcolonies existed inside the granules. One type consisted of Methanothrix-like rods with low levels of Methanobacterium-like rods; two other types appeared to be associations between syntrophic-like acetogens and Methanobacterium-like organisms. The granules were observed to be have numerous vents or channels on the surface that extended into the interior portions of the granules that may be involved in release of gas formed within the granules. The maximum substrate conversion rates (millimoles per gram of volatile suspended solids per day) at 35 degrees C in the absence of sulfate were 45.1, 8.04, 4.14, and 5.75 for ethanol, acetate, propionate, and glucose, respectively. The maximum methane production rates (millimoles per gram of volatile suspended solids per day) from H2-CO2 and formate were essentially equal for intact granules (13.7 and 13.5) and for physically disrupted granules (42 and 37). During syntrophic ethanol conversion, both hydrogen and formate were formed by the granules. The concentrations of these two intermediates were maintained at a thermodynamic equilibrium, indicating that both are intermediate metabolites in degradation. Formate accumulated and was then consumed during methanogenesis from H2-CO2. Higher concentrations of formate accumulated in the absence of sulfate than in the presence of sulfate. The addition of sulfate (8 to 9 mM) increased the maximum substrate degradation rates for propionate and ethanol by 27 and 12%, respectively. In the presence of this level of sulfate, sulfate-reducing bacteria did not play a significant role in the metabolism of H2, formate, and acetate, but ethanol and propionate were converted via sulfate reduction by approximately 28 and 60%, respectively. In the presence of 2.0 mM molybdate, syntrophic propionate and ethanol conversion by the granules was inhibited by 97 and 29%, respectively. The data show that in this granular microbial consortium, methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria did not compete for common substrates. Syntrophic propionate and ethanol conversion was likely performed primarily by sulfate-reducing bacteria, while H2, formate, and acetate were consumed primarily by methanogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1785921      PMCID: PMC183994          DOI: 10.1128/aem.57.12.3438-3449.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Light and electron microscopic examinations of methane-producing biofilms from anaerobic fixed-bed reactors.

Authors:  R W Robinson; D E Akin; R A Nordstedt; M V Thomas; H C Aldrich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Diffusion of the Interspecies Electron Carriers H(2) and Formate in Methanogenic Ecosystems and Its Implications in the Measurement of K(m) for H(2) or Formate Uptake.

Authors:  D R Boone; R L Johnson; Y Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Energetics of Growth of a Defined Mixed Culture of Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Methanosarcina barkeri: Interspecies Hydrogen Transfer in Batch and Continuous Cultures.

Authors:  A S Traore; M L Fardeau; C E Hatchikian; J Le Gall; J P Belaich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sulfate-Dependent Interspecies H(2) Transfer between Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio vulgaris during Coculture Metabolism of Acetate or Methanol.

Authors:  T J Phelps; R Conrad; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Electron donors utilized by sulfate-reducing bacteria in eutrophic lake sediments.

Authors:  R L Smith; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Control of Interspecies Electron Flow during Anaerobic Digestion: Significance of Formate Transfer versus Hydrogen Transfer during Syntrophic Methanogenesis in Flocs.

Authors:  Jurgen H Thiele; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evidence for coexistence of two distinct functional groups of sulfate-reducing bacteria in salt marsh sediment.

Authors:  I M Banat; E B Lindström; D B Nedwell; M T Balba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Propionate-Degrading Bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from Methanogenic Ecosystems.

Authors:  D R Boone; M P Bryant
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Thauer; K Jungermann; K Decker
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

10.  Influence of corrinoid antagonists on methanogen metabolism.

Authors:  W Kenealy; J G Zeikus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  24 in total

1.  In situ characterization of Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacteria active in wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  H Daims; J L Nielsen; P H Nielsen; K H Schleifer; M Wagner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cluster structure of anaerobic aggregates of an expanded granular sludge bed reactor.

Authors:  G Gonzalez-Gil; P N Lens; A Van Aelst; H Van As; A I Versprille; G Lettinga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Diversity, abundance, and activity of archaeal populations in oil-contaminated groundwater accumulated at the bottom of an underground crude oil storage cavity.

Authors:  Kazuya Watanabe; Yumiko Kodama; Natsuko Hamamura; Nobuo Kaku
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Distribution, activities, and interactions of methanogens and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; M Elizabeth Holmes; Jeffrey P Chanton; K Ramesh Reddy; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Analysis of microbial community during biofilm development in an anaerobic wastewater treatment reactor.

Authors:  Nuria Fernández; Emiliano Enrique Díaz; Ricardo Amils; José L Sanz
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Composition and role of extracellular polymers in methanogenic granules.

Authors:  M C Veiga; M K Jain; W Wu; R I Hollingsworth; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Syntrophic growth on formate: a new microbial niche in anoxic environments.

Authors:  Jan Dolfing; Bo Jiang; Anne M Henstra; Alfons J M Stams; Caroline M Plugge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Anaerobic degradation of normal- and branched-chain Fatty acids with four or more carbons to methane by a syntrophic methanogenic triculture.

Authors:  W M Wu; M K Jain; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization.

Authors:  L Raskin; L K Poulsen; D R Noguera; B E Rittmann; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Formation of Fatty Acid-degrading, anaerobic granules by defined species.

Authors:  W Wu; M K Jain; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.