Literature DB >> 26276115

Distribution, activities, and interactions of methanogens and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the Florida Everglades.

Hee-Sung Bae1, M Elizabeth Holmes2, Jeffrey P Chanton2, K Ramesh Reddy1, Andrew Ogram3.   

Abstract

To gain insight into the mechanisms controlling methanogenic pathways in the Florida Everglades, the distribution and functional activities of methanogens and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRPs) were investigated in soils (0 to 2 or 0 to 4 cm depth) across the well-documented nutrient gradient in the water conservation areas (WCAs) caused by runoff from the adjacent Everglades Agricultural Area. The methyl coenzyme M reductase gene (mcrA) sequences that were retrieved from WCA-2A, an area with relatively high concentrations of SO4 (2-) (≥39 μM), indicated that methanogens inhabiting this area were broadly distributed within the orders Methanomicrobiales, Methanosarcinales, Methanocellales, Methanobacteriales, and Methanomassiliicoccales. In more than 3 years of monitoring, quantitative PCR (qPCR) using newly designed group-specific primers revealed that the hydrogenotrophic Methanomicrobiales were more numerous than the Methanosaetaceae obligatory acetotrophs in SO4 (2-)-rich areas of WCA-2A, while the Methanosaetaceae were dominant over the Methanomicrobiales in WCA-3A (with relatively low SO4 (2-) concentrations; ≤4 μM). qPCR of dsrB sequences also indicated that SRPs are present at greater numbers than methanogens in the WCAs. In an incubation study with WCA-2A soils, addition of MoO4 (2-) (a specific inhibitor of SRP activity) resulted in increased methane production rates, lower apparent fractionation factors [αapp; defined as (amount of δ(13)CO2 + 1,000)/(amount of δ(13)CH4 + 1,000)], and higher Methanosaetaceae mcrA transcript levels compared to those for the controls without MoO4 (2-). These results indicate that SRPs play crucial roles in controlling methanogenic pathways and in shaping the structures of methanogen assemblages as a function of position along the nutrient gradient.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26276115      PMCID: PMC4592856          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01583-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  32 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing the diversity of microbial communities.

Authors:  Andrew P Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Anaerobic microflora of everglades sediments: effects of nutrients on population profiles and activities.

Authors:  H L Drake; N G Aumen; C Kuhner; C Wagner; A Griesshammer; M Schmittroth
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A rapid and simple method for estimating sulfate reduction activity and quantifying inorganic sulfides.

Authors:  G A Ulrich; L R Krumholz; J M Suflita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations.

Authors:  D R Lovley; M J Klug
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Syntrophs dominate sequences associated with the mercury methylation-related gene hgcA in the water conservation areas of the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Forrest E Dierberg; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Carbon isotopic analysis of atmospheric methane by isotope-ratio-monitoring gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  D A Merritt; J M Hayes; D J Des Marais
Journal:  J Geophys Res       Date:  1995-01-20

8.  Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments.

Authors:  M R Winfrey; J G Zeikus
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a methanogenic archaeon isolated from human faeces.

Authors:  Bédis Dridi; Marie-Laure Fardeau; Bernard Ollivier; Didier Raoult; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data.

Authors:  Micah Hamady; Catherine Lozupone; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  3 in total

1.  Periphyton and Flocculent Materials Are Important Ecological Compartments Supporting Abundant and Diverse Mercury Methylator Assemblages in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Forrest E Dierberg; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Methanogens Are Major Contributors to Nitrogen Fixation in Soils of the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Bae; Elise Morrison; Jeffrey P Chanton; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Higher Abundance of Sediment Methanogens and Methanotrophs Do Not Predict the Atmospheric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Flows in Eutrophic Tropical Freshwater Reservoirs.

Authors:  Gabrielle Maria Fonseca Pierangeli; Mercia Regina Domingues; Tatiane Araujo de Jesus; Lúcia Helena Gomes Coelho; Werner Siegfried Hanisch; Marcelo Luiz Martins Pompêo; Flávia Talarico Saia; Gustavo Bueno Gregoracci; Roseli Frederigi Benassi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.