| Literature DB >> 17854482 |
Thorid Zierold1, Bernd Hanfling, Africa Gómez.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Notostraca is a small but ancient crustacean order with a contrasting combination of a conservative morphology and a wide range of reproductive modes. The tadpole shrimp Triops cancriformis, includes bisexual - the putatively ancestral state -, androdioecious and hermaphrodite populations. As hermaphroditism and androdioecy confer a colonisation advantage, we expect the postglacial colonisation of northern Europe to have been effected by lineages with such reproductive modes. Therefore, N European populations should be composed of closely related lineages reflecting a recent range expansion. In contrast, glacial refugia in the south should contain bisexual populations with high haplotype diversity and more population structuring. To test these hypotheses, we analysed the geographic distribution of reproductive modes based on new and published sex ratio data. In addition, we investigated the European phylogeography of T. cancriformis by sequencing over a 1000 bp of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in individuals from a large sample of populations of the three recognised subspecies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17854482 PMCID: PMC2075510 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Triops cancriformis sample locations, population code, location of inferred subspecies, source of material, number of individuals sequenced for COI and ATPase and observed haplotypes (and numbers individuals per haplotype) per population, geographic are given based on the combined COI and ATPase analysis.
| Caervalerock, UK | CAE | 54°08'27" N, 003°30'58" E | Tcc | p | 1 | H6 (1) |
| Tannen, Germany | TAN | 53°34'10" N, 011°25'34" E | Tcc | p | 1 | H2 (1) |
| Döberitzer Heide, Germany | DOE | 52°31'43" N, 013°00'05" E | Tcc | h | 2 | H1 (2) |
| Lacoma, Germany | LAC1 | 51°48'12" N, 014°24'02" E | Tcc | h | 2 | H2 (2) |
| Lacoma, Germany | LAC2 | 51°48'05" N, 014°23'37" E | Tcc | h | 3 | H2 (3) |
| Lacoma, Germany | LAC3 | 51°47'47" N, 014°23'31" E | Tcc | h | 2 | H2 (2) |
| Königswartha, Germany | KOE12 | 51°19'50" N, 014°18'30" E | Tcc | h | 3 | H1 (1) |
| H2 (2) | ||||||
| Königswartha, Germany | KOE11 | 51°19'49" N, 014°18'31" E | Tcc | h | 3 | H13 (3) |
| Königswartha, Germany | KOE28 | 51°19'48" N, 014°18'12" E | Tcc | p | 4 | H13 (4) |
| Königswartha, Germany | KOE27 | 51°19'46" N, 014°18'14" E | Tcc | p | 3 | H13 (3) |
| Königswartha, Germany | KOE21 | 51°19'43" N, 014°18'23" E | Tcc | h | 9 | H1 (1) |
| H2 (3) | ||||||
| H5 (1) | ||||||
| H13 (4) | ||||||
| Godshill pond, UK | GOD | 50°55'37" N, 001°46'30" E | Tcc | h | 8 | H3 (8) |
| Ibersheim, Germany | IBE | 49°43'41" N, 008°25'55" E | Tcc | h | 2 | H3 (2) |
| Daxlander Au, Germany | DAX | 49°01'10" N, 008°17'00" E | Tcc | c | 2 | H1 (1) |
| H8 (1) | ||||||
| Hagenbach, Germany | HAG | 49°00'40" N, 008°16'25" E | Tcc | h | 1 | H8 (1) |
| Neuburg, Germany | NEU | 48°59'30" N, 008°16'25" E | Tcc | h | 3 | H3 (3) |
| Morava, Czech Republic | CZE | n.d. | Tcc | h | 1 | H2 (1) |
| Danube, Austria | DAN | n.d. | Tcc | c | 2 | H14 (2) |
| Tiszabercel, Hungary | TIZ | 48°10'38" N, 021°37'18" E | Tcc | p | 1 | H2 (1) |
| Kaiserlacke, Austria | KAI | 47°47'40" N, 016°52'31" E | Tcc | h | 3 | H2 (3) |
| Poroszlo, Hungary | POR | 47°39'01" N, 020°43'37" E | Tcc | p | 1 | H7 (1) |
| Espolla, Spain | ESP | 42°09'02" N, 002°45'60" E | Tcs* | p | 7 | H1 (6) |
| H4 (1) | ||||||
| Ares del Maestre, Spain | ARE | 40°25'19" N, 000°04'13" W | Tcm* | p | 3 | H16 (3) |
| El Puig, Spain | PUI | 39°34'24" N, 000°16'43' E | Tcs* | p | 3 | H1 (3) |
| Laguna de la Gitanilla, Spain | EXT | 39°27'00" N, 006°15'54" W | Tcm* | p | 1 | H15 (1) |
| Ullal de Baldovi, Spain | UBA | 39°14'55" N, 000°19'03" E | Tcs | p | 2 | H11 (1) |
| H12 (1) | ||||||
| Gorgo di Baglio Cofano Sicily, Italy | SIC | 38°06'11" N, 012°40'39" E | Tcc | p | 2 | H10 (2) |
| Yamagata Prefercture, Japan | YAM | 38°02'58" N, 140°10'48" E | Tcc | p | 4 | H9 (4) |
| Youssofia, Morocco | YOI | 32°17'06" N, 008°19'22" W | Tcm | p | 5 | H17 (2) |
| H18 (2) | ||||||
| H19 (1) |
p, preserved individuals collected in the wild; h, preserved individuals from laboratory rearing; c, cyst
Figure 1European distribution of Triops cancriformis showing the location of sampled populations. The dotted line indicates the continuous permafrost in the last glacial maximum (50 000–12 000 years ago) [74].
Figure 2Maximum parsimony network of Triops cancriformis based on combined COI and ATPase sequence data. Each circle represents a different haplotype, with its diameter proportional to the haplotype sample size. Each line between haplotypes represents a mutation. Populations containing each haplotype and their reproductive mode (if known) are indicated. Reproductive mode symbols as in Figure 3. Haplotypes of T. c. mauritanicus could not be joined to the T. c. cancriformis/simplex network or between themselves without exceeding the limits of parsimony, and form three disjointed networks.
Figure 3Maximum likelihood (ML) tree obtained from the combined COI and ATPase sequence alignment and the distribution of COI-ATP Triops cancriformis haplotypes in Europe (Tcc/s, Triops cancriformis cancriformis/simplex; Tcm, Triops cancriformis mauritanicus). In the phylogram, values above major branches are posterior probabilities in the Bayesian analysis; numbers below indicate the bootstrap support in the Maximum likelihood analysis (only values over 50% are shown). The tree is midpoint rooted. Inferred reproductive mode in populations of each clade is indicated by symbols. In the different clades are represented by coloured symbols in the map (green circles for clade A; red triangles for clade B; yellow squares for clade C).
Mean corrected percent sequence divergences between Triops cancriformis clade/population comparisons and estimated divergence times based on corrected COI distance. Distances are given for the combined COI-ATPase fragment as well as separately for COI and ATPase sequences. Because no crustacean molecular clock calibration factors are available for ATPase we used the COI corrected distance for approximations of divergence times. For population codes see Table 1, for clade definition see Figure 2.
| clade A vs. clade B | 2.1590 | 3.4323 | 1.5865 | 1.1332 | 0.6809 |
| clade A and B vs. C | 13.5477 | 44.5345 | 10.985 | 7.8465 | 4.7146 |
| ARE vs. YOI | 9.7768 | 24.3929 | 7.9947 | 5.6762 | 3.4106 |
| ARE&YOI vs. EXT | 10.4396 | 31.5413 | 7.8278 | 5.5912 | 3.3595 |
Sex ratio and inferred reproductive mode in European Triops cancriformis. The number (n) of individual males and females/hermaphrodites and the male proportion per pond are given. The results of the Chi-Square test to infer deviations from a null hypothesis of equal sex ratio and the inferred type of reproductive mode are provided (see text). In the populations investigated here, the collection year is indicated under the Reference heading.
| Baillargues, France | 0 | 200 | 0.000 | <0.0001 | hermaphrodite | [35] |
| Neuburg, Germany | 0 | 102 | 0.000 | <0.0001 | hermaphrodite | own data (2004–2006) |
| Jaktorów, Poland | 0 | 40 | 0.000 | <0.0001 | hermaphrodite | [75] |
| Zabieniec, Poland | 0 | 40 | 0.000 | <0.0001 | hermaphrodite | [75] |
| Godshill pond, United Kingdom | 0 | 25 | 0.000 | <0.0001 | hermaphrodite | this paper (2004–2006) |
| Königswartha (KOE25), Germany | 2 | 32 | 0.059 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | this paper (2006) |
| Bavaria, Germany | 8 | 1000 | 0.008 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [76] |
| Augsburg, Germany | 7 | 568 | 0.012 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [77] |
| Königswartha (KOE12), Germany | 10 | 95 | 0.095 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | this paper (2004 to 2006) |
| Cracow, Poland | 16 | 144 | 0.100 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [78] |
| Königswartha (KOE27), Germany | 14 | 123 | 0.102 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | this paper (2006) |
| Wroclaw, Poland | 114 | 912 | 0.111 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [79] |
| unknown location, Hungary | 9 | 34 | 0.209 | 0.0001 | androdioecious | [80] |
| Wroclaw, Poland | 29 | 88 | 0.248 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [79] |
| Lake Balaton, Hungary | 15 | 45 | 0.250 | 0.0001 | androdioecious | [81] |
| Lake Balaton, Hungary | 7 | 19 | 0.269 | 0.0186 | androdioecious | [81] |
| Cracow, Poland | 154 | 395 | 0.281 | <0.0001 | androdioecious | [78] |
| Algarve, Portugal | 19 | 23 | 0.452 | 0.5371 | bisexual | [82] |
| Algarve, Portugal | 54 | 22 | 0.711 | 0.0002 | bisexual | [82] |
| Espolla, Spain | 64 | 57 | 0.529 | 0.5245 | bisexual | this paper (2006) |
| Espolla, Spain | 1723 | 1775 | 0.493 | 0.3872 | bisexual | [33] |
Figure 4Geographic variation of male proportions in Triops cancriformis (for data and references see Table 3). The pie charts show the proportion of males in black for each population with sample size over 25. The dotted line indicates the maximal extent of permafrost in the last glacial maximum [74].