Literature DB >> 11884168

Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences.

Linda A Whittingham1, Beth Slikas, David W Winkler, Frederick H Sheldon.   

Abstract

To set the stage for historical analyses of the ecology and behavior of tree swallows and their allies (genus Tachycineta), we reconstructed the phylogeny of the nine Tachycineta species by comparing DNA sequences of six mitochondrial genes: Cytochrome b (990 base pairs), the second subunit of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase (839 base pairs), cytochrome oxidase II (85 base pairs), ATPase 8 (158 base pairs), tRNA-lysine (73 base pairs), and tRNA-methionine (25 base pairs). The phylogeny consisted of two main clades: South and Central American species ((T. stolzmanni, T. albilinea, T. albiventris), (T. leucorrhoa, T. meyeni)), and North American and Caribbean species (T. bicolor, (T. thalassina, T. euchrysea, T. cyaneoviridis)). The genetic distances among the species suggested that Tachycineta is a relatively old group compared to other New World swallow genera. One interesting biogeographic discovery was the close relationship between Caribbean and western North American taxa. This historical connection occurs in other groups of swallows and swifts as well. To reconstruct the phylogeny, we employed Bayesian as well as traditional maximum-likelihood methods. The Bayesian approach provided probability values for trees produced from the different genes and gene combinations, as well as probabilities of branches within those trees. We compared Bayesian and maximum-likelihood bootstrap branch support and found that all branches with Bayesian probabilities > or = 95% received bootstrap support >70%. (C)2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11884168     DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  10 in total

Review 1.  Statistical measures of uncertainty for branches in phylogenetic trees inferred from molecular sequences by using model-based methods.

Authors:  Borys Wróbel
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Phylogenetic reconstruction of a known HIV-1 CRF04_cpx transmission network using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods.

Authors:  Dimitrios Paraskevis; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Gkikas Magiorkinis; Vassilios G Kiosses; Philippe Lemey; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Andrew Rambaut; Angelos Hatzakis
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Systematics of the Neotropical genus Catharylla Zeller (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae s. l., Crambinae).

Authors:  Théo Léger; Bernard Landry; Matthias Nuss; Richard Mally
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 1.546

4.  The genetics of vitamin C loss in vertebrates.

Authors:  Guy Drouin; Jean-Rémi Godin; Benoît Pagé
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  Clock gene variation in Tachycineta swallows.

Authors:  Roi Dor; Caren B Cooper; Irby J Lovette; Viviana Massoni; Flor Bulit; Marcela Liljesthrom; David W Winkler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Recent evolution of alternative reproductive modes in the 'living fossil' Triops cancriformis.

Authors:  Thorid Zierold; Bernd Hanfling; Africa Gómez
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.

Authors:  Jessica C Mar; Timothy J Harlow; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Genetic Differentiation in Insular Lowland Rainforests: Insights from Historical Demographic Patterns in Philippine Birds.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Sánchez-González; Peter A Hosner; Robert G Moyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Support for Lungfish as the Closest Relative of Tetrapods by Using Slowly Evolving Ray-Finned Fish as the Outgroup.

Authors:  Naoko Takezaki; Hidenori Nishihara
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Resolving the Phylogenetic Position of Coelacanth: The Closest Relative Is Not Always the Most Appropriate Outgroup.

Authors:  Naoko Takezaki; Hidenori Nishihara
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.416

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.