Literature DB >> 17854250

The Prevention of Recurrent Episodes of Depression with Venlafaxine for Two Years (PREVENT) Study: Outcomes from the 2-year and combined maintenance phases.

Martin B Keller1, Madhukar H Trivedi, Michael E Thase, Richard C Shelton, Susan G Kornstein, Charles B Nemeroff, Edward S Friedman, Alan J Gelenberg, James H Kocsis, David L Dunner, Robert M A Hirschfeld, Anthony J Rothschild, James M Ferguson, Alan F Schatzberg, John M Zajecka, Ronald D Pedersen, Bing Yan, Saeeduddin Ahmed, Jeff Musgnung, Philip T Ninan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report second-year results from the 2-year maintenance phase of a long-term study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine extended release (ER) in preventing recurrence of depression.
METHOD: Outpatients with recurrent unipolar depression (DSM-IV criteria; N = 1096) were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to 10 weeks of treatment with venlafaxine ER or fluoxetine. Responders (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D(17)] total score <or= 12 and >or= 50% decrease from baseline) entered a 6-month, double-blind continuation phase on the same medication. Continuation-phase responders were enrolled into maintenance treatment consisting of 2 consecutive 12-month phases. At the start of each maintenance phase, venlafaxine ER responders were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with venlafaxine ER or placebo, and fluoxetine responders were continued for each period. The second 12-month maintenance phase compared the time to recurrence of depression with venlafaxine ER (75 to 300 mg/day) versus placebo as the primary efficacy measure. The primary definition of recurrence was a HAM-D(17) total score > 12 and < 50% reduction from baseline (acute phase) at 2 consecutive visits or at the last valid visit prior to discontinuation. The time to recurrence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between the venlafaxine ER and placebo groups using log-rank tests. Secondary outcome measures included rates of response and remission (defined as HAM-D(17) </= 7). The study was conducted from December 2000 through July 2005.
RESULTS: The cumulative probabilities of recurrence through 12 months in the venlafaxine ER (N = 43) and placebo (N = 40) groups were 8.0% (95% CI = 0.0 to 16.8) and 44.8% (95% CI = 27.6 to 62.0), respectively (p < .001). At month 12, using last-observation-carried-forward analysis, the rate of response or remission was significantly higher in the venlafaxine ER group (93%) than in the placebo group (63%; p = .002). Overall discontinuation rates were 28% and 63% in the venlafaxine ER and placebo groups, respectively. Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation for 1 patient (2%) in the venlafax-ine ER group and 4 (10%) in the placebo group. An analysis of the combined maintenance phases, which compared the risk of recurrence over 24 months for patients assigned to venlafaxine ER (N = 129) or placebo (N = 129) for the first maintenance phase, showed a significantly greater cumulative probability of recurrence through 24 months for the placebo group (47.3% [95% CI = 36.4 to 58.2]) than for the venlafaxine ER group (28.5% [95% CI = 18.3 to 38.7]; p = .005).
CONCLUSION: In this study, an additional 12 months of maintenance therapy with venlafaxine ER was effective in preventing recurrence of depression in patients who had been responders to venlafaxine ER after acute (10 weeks), continuation (6 months), and initial maintenance (12 months) therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00046020 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17854250     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  28 in total

1.  Concordance between clinician and patient ratings as predictors of response, remission, and recurrence in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Thomas Li; Susan G Kornstein; Edward S Friedman; Anthony J Rothschild; Ron Pedersen; Philip Ninan; Martin Keller; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  The association between conventional antidepressants and the metabolic syndrome: a review of the evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Roger S McIntyre; Ka Young Park; Candy W Y Law; Farah Sultan; Amanda Adams; Maria Teresa Lourenco; Aaron K S Lo; Joanna K Soczynska; Hanna Woldeyohannes; Mohammad Alsuwaidan; Jinju Yoon; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment.

Authors:  Paul E Holtzheimer; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 4.  How should primary care doctors select which antidepressants to administer?

Authors:  Gerald Gartlehner; Kylie Thaler; Seth Hill; Richard A Hansen
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Do antidepressants really work?

Authors:  Pierre Blier
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Recovery and subsequent recurrence in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Peter Holland; Weihang Bao; Philip T Ninan; Martin B Keller
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Comparative effectiveness of continuation and maintenance treatments for persistent depressive disorder in adults.

Authors:  Katja Machmutow; Ramona Meister; Alessa Jansen; Levente Kriston; Birgit Watzke; Martin Christian Härter; Sarah Liebherz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-20

8.  Follow-up of monotherapy remitters in the PReDICT study: Maintenance treatment outcomes and clinical predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  Jamie C Kennedy; Boadie W Dunlop; Linda W Craighead; Charles B Nemeroff; Helen S Mayberg; W Edward Craighead
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-02

9.  Assessing the efficacy of 2 years of maintenance treatment with venlafaxine extended release 75-225 mg/day in patients with recurrent major depression: a secondary analysis of data from the PREVENT study.

Authors:  Susan G Kornstein; James H Kocsis; Saeeduddin Ahmed; Michael Thase; Edward S Friedman; Boadie W Dunlop; Bing Yan; Ron Pedersen; Philip T Ninan; Thomas Li; Martin Keller
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.659

Review 10.  Continuation treatment of major depressive disorder: is there a case for duloxetine?

Authors:  Trevor R Norman; James S Olver
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.