Literature DB >> 23904918

Extracorporeal Shock-wave Lithotripsy Success Rate and Complications: Initial Experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

Mohammed S Al-Marhoon1, Omar Shareef, Ismail S Al-Habsi, Ataalrahman S Al Balushi, Josephkunju Mathew, Krishna P Venkiteswaran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with Modularis Vario Siemens in the management of patients with renal and ureteral stones.
METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, 225 outpatients were treated with Siemens Modularis Vario lithotripter at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Stone size, location, total number of shockwaves, stone-free rate, complications and adjunctive interventions were investigated. Chi-Square and Logistic Regression analyses were used, with p<0.05 set as the level of significance.
RESULTS: Of the 225 initial consecutive patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, 192 (85%) had renal stones and 33 (15%) had ureteric stones. The mean±SD stone size was 11.3±4.5 mm, while the mean age of the patients was 39.9±12.8 years with 68.5% males. The mean renal stone size was 11.6±4.7 mm; a mean of 1.3 sessions was required. The mean ureteric stone size was 9.9±3 mm; and a mean of 1.3 sessions was required. Treatment success (defined as complete clearance of ureteric stones, stone-free or clinically insignificant residual fragments of <4 mm for renal stones) was 74% for renal stones and 88% for ureteric stones. Additional extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy were the most adjunctive procedures used for stone clearance. Complications occurred in 74 patients (38.5%) with renal stones and 13 patients (39.4%) with uretetric stones. The most common complication was loin pain (experienced by 16.7% with renal stones and 21% with ureteric stones). Severe renal colic mandating admission occurred in 2% of patients with renal stones and 6% of patients with ureteric stones. In patients with renal stone, steinstrasse occurred in 3.6% and infection post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 0.5%. Using Multivariate Logistic Regression analysis, factors found to have significant effect on complete stone clearance were serum creatinine (p=0.004) and the number of shockwaves (p=0.021).
CONCLUSION: Siemens Modularis Vario lithotripter is a safe and effective tool for treating renal and ureteric stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL); Kidney; Stones; Ureter

Year:  2013        PMID: 23904918      PMCID: PMC3725239          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2013.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


  16 in total

1.  Shock wave lithotripsy is not predictive of hypertension among community stone formers at long-term followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Andrew D Rule; Xujian Li; Eric J Bergstralh; Matthew T Gettman; John C Lieske
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The isolated perfused kidney: an in vitro test system for evaluation of renal tissue damage induced by high-energy shockwaves sources.

Authors:  Th Bergsdorf; S Thüroff; Ch Chaussy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  The preferred treatment for upper tract stones is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or ureteroscopic: pro ESWL.

Authors:  Chaussy Christian; Bergsdorf Thorsten
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20-mm single upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Anila Jamshaid; M Hammad Ather; Ghazi Hussain; Karim B Khawaja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Massive retroperitoneal haemorrhage after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Authors:  Hiromasa Inoue; Thomas Kamphausen; Thomas Bajanowski; Kurt Trübner
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients.

Authors:  D Bon; B Dore; J Irani; M Marroncle; J Aubert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Efficacy of tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to treat urolithiasis.

Authors:  Marin I Georgiev; Dimitar I Ormanov; Vasil D Vassilev; Plamen D Dimitrov; Vladislav D Mladenov; Elenko P Popov; Petar P Simeonov; Petar K Panchev
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  The outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal pelvic stone with and without JJ stent--a comparative study.

Authors:  Nazim Mohayuddin; Hamad Afzal Malik; Manzoor Hussain; Salman Ahmed Tipu; Asad Shehzad; Altaf Hashmi; Syed Ali Anwar Naqvi; Syed Adibul Hasan Rizvi
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.781

9.  Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.

Authors:  C Chaussy; W Brendel; E Schmiedt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical experience with shock-wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Modularis Vario lithotripter.

Authors:  Mohamed E Hassouna; Samir Oraby; Wael Sameh; Ahmed El-Abbady
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-09-09
View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of proximal ureteral stones: A single center experience.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Yashfeen Malik; Utbah Nadeem; Maham Khalid; Amna Pirzada; Mehr Majeed; Hajra Arshad Malik; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-05-01

2.  Comparison of Different Analgesia Drug Regimens for Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones: A Randomized Control Study.

Authors:  Muhammad Waqas; Amna Butt; Mohammad Ayaz Khan; Ijaz Khan; Imad-Ud-Din Saqib; Tariq Hussain; Saeed Akhter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Structure Types of Kidney Stones and Their Susceptibility to Shock Wave Fragmentation.

Authors:  Sergiy Kolupayev; Vladimir Lesovoy; Elena Bereznyak; Nina Andonieva; Dmytro Shchukin
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2021-03

4.  Cross-sectional imaging of iatrogenic complications after extracorporeal and endourological treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Federica Villa; Sonia Ippolito; Alessandra Pagani; Roberto Bianco
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-09-26

5.  By-products of lithotripsy: Are they related to abdominal fat and wave characteristics?

Authors:  Raed S M Al-Naemi; Haval Y Y Aldosky; Bayan S A Shukri
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-05

6.  Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment.

Authors:  Sanjay Shinde; Younis Al Balushi; Medhat Hossny; Sachin Jose; Salma Al Busaidy
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-05

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi.

Authors:  Christian D Fankhauser; Thomas Hermanns; Laura Lieger; Olivia Diethelm; Martin Umbehr; Thomas Luginbühl; Tullio Sulser; Michael Müntener; Cédric Poyet
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2018-01-25

8.  Effectiveness of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi of 5-15 mm: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Damian Weber; Michael Müntener; Cedric Poyet; Tullio Sulser; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-02-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.