Literature DB >> 17850262

Microarray analysis of Mu transposition in Salmonella enterica, serovar Typhimurium: transposon exclusion by high-density DNA binding proteins.

Dipankar Manna1, Steffen Porwollik, Michael McClelland, Ruimin Tan, N Patrick Higgins.   

Abstract

All organisms contain transposons with the potential to disrupt and rearrange genes. Despite the presence of these destabilizing sequences, some genomes show remarkable stability over evolutionary time. Do bacteria defend the genome against disruption by transposons? Phage Mu replicates by transposition and virtually all genes are potential insertion targets. To test whether bacteria limit Mu transposition to specific parts of the chromosome, DNA arrays of Salmonella enterica were used to quantitatively measure target site preference and compare the data with Escherichia coli. Essential genes were as susceptible to transposon disruption as non-essential ones in both organisms, but the correlation of transposition hot spots among homologous genes was poor. Genes in highly transcribed operons were insulated from transposon mutagenesis in both organisms. A 10 kb cold spot on the pSLT plasmid was near parS, a site to which the ParB protein binds and spreads along DNA. Deleting ParB erased the plasmid cold spot, and an ectopic parS site placed in the Salmonella chromosome created a new cold spot in the presence of ParB. Our data show that competition between cellular proteins and transposition proteins on plasmids and the chromosome is a dominant factor controlling the genetic footprint of transposons in living cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850262     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05915.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

2.  Congruence of in vivo and in vitro insertion patterns in hot E. coli gene targets of transposable element Mu: opposing roles of MuB in target capture and integration.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The Essential Genome of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Emily C A Goodall; Ashley Robinson; Iain G Johnston; Sara Jabbari; Keith A Turner; Adam F Cunningham; Peter A Lund; Jeffrey A Cole; Ian R Henderson
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 7.867

4.  Transposition Behavior Revealed by High-Resolution Description of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Saltovirus Integration Sites.

Authors:  Gilles Vergnaud; Cédric Midoux; Yann Blouin; Maria Bourkaltseva; Victor Krylov; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  The fitness landscape of the African Salmonella Typhimurium ST313 strain D23580 reveals unique properties of the pBT1 plasmid.

Authors:  Rocío Canals; Roy R Chaudhuri; Rebecca E Steiner; Siân V Owen; Natalia Quinones-Olvera; Melita A Gordon; Michael Baym; Michael Ibba; Jay C D Hinton
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 6.823

6.  Functional genomics reveals the toxin-antitoxin repertoire and AbiE activity in Serratia.

Authors:  Hannah G Hampton; Leah M Smith; Shaun Ferguson; Sean Meaden; Simon A Jackson; Peter C Fineran
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2020-11

7.  A comparison of dense transposon insertion libraries in the Salmonella serovars Typhi and Typhimurium.

Authors:  Lars Barquist; Gemma C Langridge; Daniel J Turner; Minh-Duy Phan; A Keith Turner; Alex Bateman; Julian Parkhill; John Wain; Paul P Gardner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Approaches to querying bacterial genomes with transposon-insertion sequencing.

Authors:  Lars Barquist; Christine J Boinett; Amy K Cain
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  The Nucleoid Binding Protein H-NS Biases Genome-Wide Transposon Insertion Landscapes.

Authors:  Satoshi Kimura; Troy P Hubbard; Brigid M Davis; Matthew K Waldor
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 7.867

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.