Literature DB >> 9351832

Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells.

M Tada1, T Tada, L Lefebvre, S C Barton, M A Surani.   

Abstract

Genomic reprogramming of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which includes genome-wide demethylation, prevents aberrant epigenetic modifications from being transmitted to subsequent generations. This process also ensures that homologous chromosomes first acquire an identical epigenetic status before an appropriate switch in the imprintable loci in the female and male germ lines. Embryonic germ (EG) cells have a similar epigenotype to PGCs from which they are derived. We used EG cells to investigate the mechanism of epigenetic modifications in the germ line by analysing the effects on a somatic nucleus in the EG-thymic lymphocyte hybrid cells. There were striking changes in methylation of the somatic nucleus, resulting in demethylation of several imprinted and non-imprinted genes. These epigenetic modifications were heritable and affected gene expression as judged by re-activation of the silent maternal allele of Peg1/Mest imprinted gene in the somatic nucleus. This remarkable change in the epigenotype of the somatic nucleus is consistent with the observed pluripotency of the EG-somatic hybrid cells as they differentiated into a variety of tissues in chimeric embryos. The epigenetic modifications observed in EG-somatic cell hybrids in vitro are comparable to the reprogramming events that occur during germ cell development.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9351832      PMCID: PMC1170256          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.21.6510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  42 in total

1.  Use of a HpaII-polymerase chain reaction assay to study DNA methylation in the Pgk-1 CpG island of mouse embryos at the time of X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  J Singer-Sam; M Grant; J M LeBon; K Okuyama; V Chapman; M Monk; A D Riggs
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Gene expression of differentiated parent in teratocarcinoma cell hybrids. Repression or reprogramming?

Authors:  J Forejt; S Gregorová; K Dohnal; J Nosek
Journal:  Cell Differ       Date:  1984-12

3.  De novo methylation, expression, and infectivity of retroviral genomes introduced into embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  C L Stewart; H Stuhlmann; D Jähner; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  X-chromosome activity in foetal germ cells of the mouse.

Authors:  M Monk; A McLaren
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1981-06

5.  Properties of teratocarcinoma-thymus somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  R A Miller; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Somatic Cell Genet       Date:  1977-05

6.  The mouse Thy-1.2 glycoprotein gene: complete sequence and identification of an unusual promoter.

Authors:  H A Ingraham; G M Lawless; G A Evans
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Reversal of X-inactivation in female mouse somatic cells hybridized with murine teratocarcinoma stem cells in vitro.

Authors:  N Takagi; M A Yoshida; O Sugawara; M Sasaki
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Construction of a small Mus musculus repetitive DNA library: identification of a new satellite sequence in Mus musculus.

Authors:  D F Pietras; K L Bennett; L D Siracusa; M Woodworth-Gutai; V M Chapman; K W Gross; C Kane-Haas; N D Hastie
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Pluripotent teratocarcinoma-thymus somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  R A Miller; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development.

Authors:  M Monk; M Boubelik; S Lehnert
Journal:  Development       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  116 in total

1.  Lsh, a member of the SNF2 family, is required for genome-wide methylation.

Authors:  K Dennis; T Fan; T Geiman; Q Yan; K Muegge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  From intestine to muscle: nuclear reprogramming through defective cloned embryos.

Authors:  J A Byrne; S Simonsson; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The marks, mechanisms and memory of epigenetic states in mammals.

Authors:  V K Rakyan; J Preis; H D Morgan; E Whitelaw
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nuclear reprogramming in cell-free extracts.

Authors:  Philippe Collas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Genes and transposons are differentially methylated in plants, but not in mammals.

Authors:  Pablo D Rabinowicz; Lance E Palmer; Bruce P May; Michael T Hemann; Scott W Lowe; W Richard McCombie; Robert A Martienssen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  Biomedical and agricultural applications of animal transgenesis.

Authors:  Alison J Thomson; Jim McWhir
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 9.  Stem cell plasticity, beyond alchemy.

Authors:  Michael S Rutenberg; Takashi Hamazaki; Amar M Singh; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Epigenetically regulated imprinted genes and foetal programming.

Authors:  Eric B Keverne
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.