Literature DB >> 17848034

Cognitive implications of facilitating echoic persistence.

Carryl L Baldwin1.   

Abstract

Seventeen participants performed a tone-pattern-matching task at different presentation levels while concurrently engaged in a simulated-driving task. Presentation levels of 60, 65, and 70 dBC (SPL) were combined factorially with tone-matching delays of 2, 3, and 4 sec. Intensity had no effect on performance in single-task conditions and short-delay conditions. However, when the participants were engaged concurrently in the driving task, a significant interaction between presentation level and delay was observed. In the longest delay condition, the participants performed the tone-pattern-matching task more efficiently (more quickly and without additional errors) as presentation intensity increased. These findings demonstrate the interaction between sensory and cognitive processes and point to a direct-intensity relationship where intensity affects the persistence of echoic memory. Implications for facilitating auditory processing and improving auditory interfaces in complex systems (i.e., transportation environments), particularly for older and hearing-impaired listeners, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848034     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Decay time of the auditory sensory memory trace during wakefulness and REM sleep.

Authors:  M Atienza; J L Cantero; C M Gómez
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Impact of speech presentation level on cognitive task performance: implications for auditory display design.

Authors:  Carryl L Baldwin; David Struckman-Johnson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  EXPERIMENTS ON THE FOUR-EARED MAN.

Authors:  N MORAY; A BATES; T BARNETT
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing.

Authors:  Timothy B O'Rourke; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

6.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

Review 7.  Inverse-intensity effect in duration of visible persistence.

Authors:  V Di Lollo; W F Bischof
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.

Authors:  M K Pichora-Fuller; B A Schneider; M Daneman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The modality effect and echoic persistence.

Authors:  O C Watkins; M J Watkins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-09

Review 10.  The phonological loop as a language learning device.

Authors:  A Baddeley; S Gathercole; C Papagno
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  5 in total

1.  Differential effect of aging on verbal and visuo-spatial working memory.

Authors:  Navnit Kumar; Brajesh Priyadarshi
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 6.745

2.  Impact of sensory acuity on auditory working memory span in young and older adults.

Authors:  Carryl L Baldwin; Ivan K Ash
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-03

3.  Monitoring the capacity of working memory: executive control and effects of listening effort.

Authors:  Nicole M Amichetti; Raymond S Stanley; Alison G White; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

4.  The impact of noise and hearing loss on the processing of simultaneous sentences.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  Cognitive aging and hearing acuity: modeling spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield; Nicole M Amichetti; Amanda Lash
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.