Literature DB >> 23946892

Differential effect of aging on verbal and visuo-spatial working memory.

Navnit Kumar1, Brajesh Priyadarshi.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) declines with age. However it seems unclear, whether age related decline is more pronounced on verbal WM or on visuo-spatial WM. The present study compares the effect of aging on verbal and visuo-spatial modality of WM on native Hindi healthy speakers, in the age range of 40-to-above 80 years. It was found that normal aging affect both the verbal and visual working memory in similar way. Both modality declines with a similar rate up to 50-60 years and after 60 years relative saturation in span take place. Although verbal WM span is higher than visuo-spatial WM span, but no significant difference between verbal and visuo-spatial WM span were observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; verbal working memory; visuo-spatial working memory

Year:  2013        PMID: 23946892      PMCID: PMC3733580     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Dis        ISSN: 2152-5250            Impact factor:   6.745


  29 in total

1.  Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition.

Authors:  L Jenkins; J Myerson; J A Joerding; S Hale
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-03

2.  Interference with visual short-term memory.

Authors:  R H Logie; G M Zucco; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-10

3.  Age-related differences in control processes in verbal and visuospatial working memory: storage, transformation, supervision, and coordination.

Authors:  Kara L Bopp; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman; David A Rettinger; Priti Shah; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

Review 6.  Cognition and hearing aids.

Authors:  Thomas Lunner; Mary Rudner; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

Review 7.  Cellular basis of working memory.

Authors:  P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Task complexity and age differences in working memory.

Authors:  M L Gick; F I Craik; R G Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

9.  Age-related differences in updating working memory.

Authors:  M Van der Linden; S Brédart; A Beerten
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1994-02

10.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Working Memory and its Relationship to Aphasia.

Authors:  Heather Harris Wright; Gerasimos Fergadiotis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.773

View more
  5 in total

1.  Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Random walk: Random number generation during backward and forward walking- the role of aging.

Authors:  Maxim Shapiro; Samuel Shaki; Uri Gottlieb; Shmuel Springer
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.702

3.  Puzzling with online games (BAM-COG): reliability, validity, and feasibility of an online self-monitor for cognitive performance in aging adults.

Authors:  Teun Aalbers; Maria A E Baars; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  FMRI of working memory impairment after recovery from subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Timothy M Ellmore; Fiona Rohlffs; Faraz Khursheed
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  The Effect of Attentional Cueing and Spatial Uncertainty in Visual Field Testing.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.