Literature DB >> 12270588

Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing.

Timothy B O'Rourke1, Phillip J Holcomb.   

Abstract

The Cohort model (Marslen-Wilson, Spoken Word Recognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, pp. 71-103) proposes that spoken words are frequently recognized at the first point in the acoustic signal where a unique lexical representation is specified. This proposal was tested in two experiments. In experiment 1 participants made speeded lexical decisions to spoken words and pseudowords. In experiment 2 participants passively listened without making overt responses. In both experiments the recognition points for words (the point past which no other lexical item was consistent with the acoustic signal) and deviation points for pseudowords (the point past which no real word is compatible with the acoustic signal) were manipulated. An ERP negativity in the region of the N400 component and RT occurred sooner for items with early than late recognition/deviation points when measures were time-locked to stimulus onset. In experiment 1, when time-locking was to recognition/deviation points, early and late words produced N400s and RTs with indistinguishable latencies, while late pseudowords produced faster RTs and earlier N400s than early pseudowords. Experiment 2 replicated the N 400 effects for words, but only produced a trend in the same direction as experiment 1 for pseudowords.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12270588     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(02)00045-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  20 in total

1.  Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Investigating the time course of spoken word recognition: electrophysiological evidence for the influences of phonological similarity.

Authors:  Amy S Desroches; Randy Lynn Newman; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  On the locus of talker-specificity effects in spoken word recognition: an ERP study with dichotic priming.

Authors:  Sophie Dufour; Dierdre Bolger; Stephanie Massol; Phillip J Holcomb; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Cognitive implications of facilitating echoic persistence.

Authors:  Carryl L Baldwin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

6.  Developmental differences in the influence of phonological similarity on spoken word processing in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Malins; Danqi Gao; Ran Tao; James R Booth; Hua Shu; Marc F Joanisse; Li Liu; Amy S Desroches
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Evidence of deficient central speech processing in children with specific language impairment: the T-complex.

Authors:  Valerie L Shafer; Richard G Schwartz; Brett Martin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Spoken verb processing in Spanish: An analysis using a new online resource.

Authors:  Semilla M Rivera; Elizabeth A Bates; Araceli Orozco-Figueroa; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2010-01

9.  Putting underspecification in context: ERP evidence for sparse representations in morphophonological alternations.

Authors:  Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Neural correlates of successful semantic processing during propofol sedation.

Authors:  Ram M Adapa; Matthew H Davis; Emmanuel A Stamatakis; Anthony R Absalom; David K Menon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.