Literature DB >> 17845471

What motivates women to take part in clinical and basic science endometriosis research?

Sanjay K Agarwal1, Sylvia Estrada, Warren G Foster, L Lewis Wall, Doug Brown, Elaine S Revis, Suzanne Rodriguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to identify factors motivating women to take part in endometriosis research and to determine if these factors differ for women participating in clinical versus basic science studies.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 24 women volunteering for participation in endometriosis-related research were asked to indicate, in their own words, why they chose to volunteer. In addition, the women were asked to rate, on a scale of 0 to 10, sixteen potentially motivating factors. The information was gathered in the form of an anonymous self-administered questionnaire.
RESULTS: Strong motivating factors (mean score > 8) included potential benefit to other women's health, improvement to one's own condition, and participation in scientific advancement. Weak motivating factors (mean score < 3) included financial compensation, making one's doctor happy, and use of 'natural' products. No difference was detected between clinical and basic science study participants.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first study to specifically investigate the factors that motivate women to take part in endometriosis research. Understanding why women choose to take part in such research is important to the integrity of the informed consent process. The factors most strongly motivating women to participate in endometriosis research related to improving personal or public health; the weakest, to financial compensation and pleasing the doctor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17845471     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00552.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  5 in total

1.  Exploring the reasons urban and rural-dwelling older adults participate in memory research.

Authors:  Amanda Hunsaker; C Elizabeth Sarles; Daniel Rosen; Jennifer H Lingler; Marla Bonacile Johnson; Lisa Morrow; Judith Saxton
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.035

2.  Altruistic reasoning in adolescent-parent dyads considering participation in a hypothetical sexual health clinical trial for adolescents.

Authors:  Noé Rubén Chávez; Camille Y Williams; Lisa S Ipp; Marina Catallozzi; Susan L Rosenthal; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Res Ethics       Date:  2015-05-27

3.  A New Measure of Research Participant Burden: Brief Report.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lingler; Karen L Schmidt; Amanda L Gentry; Lu Hu; Lauren A Terhorst
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  Rethinking endometriosis care: applying the chronic care model via a multidisciplinary program for the care of women with endometriosis.

Authors:  Sanjay K Agarwal; Warren G Foster; Erik J Groessl
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-07-23

5.  The experiences of endometriosis patients with diagnosis and treatment in New Zealand.

Authors:  Katherine Ellis; Deborah Munro; Rachael Wood
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.