Literature DB >> 17833780

The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology: A technique for isolating effects of response bias finds wide use in the study of perception and cognition.

J A Swets.   

Abstract

The clinician looking, listening, or feeling for signs of a disease may far prefer a false alarm to a miss, particularly if the disease is serious and contagious. On the other hand, he may believe that the available therapy is marginally effective, expensive, and debilitating. The pilot seeing the landing lights only when they are a few yards away may decide that his plane is adequately aligned with the runway if he is alone and familiar with that plight. He may be more inclined to circle the field before another try at landing if he has many passengers and recent memory of another plane crashing under those circumstances. The Food and Drug administrator suspecting botulism in a canned food may not want to accept even a remote threat to the public health. But he may be less clearly biased if a recent false alarm has cost a canning company millions of dollars and left some damaged reputations. The making of almost any fine discrimination is beset with such considerations of probability and utility, which are extraneous and potentially confounding when one is attempting to measure the acuity of discrimination per se. The ROC is an analytical technique, with origins in statistical decision theory and electronic detection theory, that quite effectively isolates the effects of the observer's response bias, or decision criterion, in the study of discrimination behavior. This capability, pursued through a century of psychological testing, provides a relatively pure measure of the discriminability of different stimuli and of the capacity of organisms to discriminate. The ROC also treats quantitatively the response, or decision, aspects of choice behavior. The decision parameter can then be functionally related to the probabilities of the stimulus alternatives and to the utilities of the various stimulus-response pairs, or to the observer's expectations and motivations. In separating and quantifying discrimination and decision processes, the ROC promises a more reliable and valid solution to some practical problems and enhances our understanding of the perceptual and cognitive phenomena that depend directly on these fundamental processes. In several problem areas in psychology, effects that were supposed to reflect properties of the discrimination process have been shown by the ROC analysis to reflect instead properties of the decision process.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 17833780     DOI: 10.1126/science.182.4116.990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  79 in total

1.  Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions.

Authors:  Susan J Galvin; John V Podd; Vit Drga; John Whitmore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-10-27

3.  Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Kumiko Ishikawa; Takayuki Nagai; Yuko Yamada; Akira Negi; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Accuracy and measures of association of anthropometric indexes of obesity to identify the presence of hypertension in adults: a population-based study in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Diego Augusto Santos Silva; Edio Luiz Petroski; Marco Aurelio Peres
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Kidney function and risk triage in adults: threshold values and hierarchical importance.

Authors:  Robert N Foley; Changchun Wang; Jon J Snyder; Andrew D Rule; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 6.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Roger C Barr; Loren W Nolte; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

8.  Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Henri Hannula; Shelley Ylioja; Antti Pertovaara; Antti Korvenoja; Jarmo Ruohonen; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Synnöve Carlson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  A signal detection analysis of contingency data.

Authors:  Lorraine G Allan; Shepard Siegel; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Transient Hearing Loss Within a Critical Period Causes Persistent Changes to Cellular Properties in Adult Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.