Literature DB >> 17825595

A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy.

Hiram A Gay1, Andrzej Niemierko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Provide a simple research tool that may be used to calculate the NCTP or TCP of a particular treatment plan. Illustrate the implementation of the EUD-based NTCP and TCP models as a research tool. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A high-level computing language was chosen to implement Niemierko's EUD-based NTCP and TCP mathematical models. The necessary treatment planning software requirements were clearly defined.
RESULTS: The computer code is presented and explained. Six simple examples were created to quickly troubleshoot the reader's code implementation. A table of model parameters based on the Emami data was generated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17825595     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  94 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Su-Hua Lo; Yu-Wen Wang; Chiu-Ching Tuan; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  G S J Tudor; Y L Rimmer; T B Nguyen; M A Cowen; S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The use of TCP based EUD to rank and compare lung radiotherapy plans: in-silico study to evaluate the correlation between TCP with physical quality indices.

Authors:  Abdulhamid Chaikh; Jacques Balosso
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06

4.  Objective assessment of image quality VI: imaging in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Matthew A Kupinski; Stefan Müeller; Howard J Halpern; John C Morris; Roisin Dwyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  A framework for implementation of organ effect models in TOPAS with benchmarks extended to proton therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; J Perl; J Schümann; J Shin; H Paganetti; B Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Comparison between the four-field box and field-in-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the esophagus using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities.

Authors:  Farzaneh Allaveisi; Amir Nami Moghadam
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Dosimetric advantages of generalised equivalent uniform dose-based optimisation on dose-volume objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  T-F Lee; H-M Ting; P-J Chao; H-Y Wang; C-S Shieh; M-F Horng; J-M Wu; S-A Yeh; M-Y Cho; E-Y Huang; Y-J Huang; H-C Chen; F-M Fang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Dose prescription point in forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy of breast and head/neck cancers.

Authors:  Farzaneh Allaveisi; Nasrin Amini; Sohrab Sakineh Pour
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-08

9.  Effect of fluence smoothing on the quality of intensity-modulated radiation treatment plans.

Authors:  Puzhakkal Niyas; Kallikuzhiyil Kochunny Abdullah; Manthala Padannayil Noufal; Thekkedath Sankaran Nair
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-03-07

10.  Helical tomotherapy for single and multiple liver tumours.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su; Stephen W Leung; Hsuan-Chih Hsu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.