INTRODUCTION: We compare the racial and ethnic demographics of our participants with the populations where our clinics are located (Texas and British Columbia) and investigate the reasons cited for participation. METHODS: We compared the distribution of participants by race/ethnicity to numbers from the 2000 United States Census and the 2001 Census of Canada. Each participant recorded her reasons for enrolling in the trial in her own words. This information was then categorized for analysis. For participants who provided more than one reason for participation, their responses were weighted accordingly to sum 100% for each race. All analyses were performed using SPSS v12.0 (SPSS, Chicago). RESULTS: In all, 1850 women participated in the study. Except for Asians in the Vancouver population and Native Americans in both populations, all minorities were recruited in proportions in excess of their respective proportions in the general population. Distinct differences in the reasons for participating between sites were noted. Houston patients were more likely to cite concern for one's own health as a reason for participating. On the other hand, Vancouver patients were more likely to cite helping others. This trend was found in both the screening and diagnostic populations. CONCLUSIONS: We attribute our success in recruiting minorities to community outreach, our multicultural staff, and efforts to provide uniform care at all sites.
INTRODUCTION: We compare the racial and ethnic demographics of our participants with the populations where our clinics are located (Texas and British Columbia) and investigate the reasons cited for participation. METHODS: We compared the distribution of participants by race/ethnicity to numbers from the 2000 United States Census and the 2001 Census of Canada. Each participant recorded her reasons for enrolling in the trial in her own words. This information was then categorized for analysis. For participants who provided more than one reason for participation, their responses were weighted accordingly to sum 100% for each race. All analyses were performed using SPSS v12.0 (SPSS, Chicago). RESULTS: In all, 1850 women participated in the study. Except for Asians in the Vancouver population and Native Americans in both populations, all minorities were recruited in proportions in excess of their respective proportions in the general population. Distinct differences in the reasons for participating between sites were noted. Houston patients were more likely to cite concern for one's own health as a reason for participating. On the other hand, Vancouver patients were more likely to cite helping others. This trend was found in both the screening and diagnostic populations. CONCLUSIONS: We attribute our success in recruiting minorities to community outreach, our multicultural staff, and efforts to provide uniform care at all sites.
Authors: M Killien; J A Bigby; V Champion; E Fernandez-Repollet; R D Jackson; M Kagawa-Singer; K Kidd; M J Naughton; M Prout Journal: J Womens Health Gend Based Med Date: 2000-12
Authors: Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Jon Tilburt; Shari Bolen; Charles Baffi; Renee F Wilson; Mollie W Howerton; M Chris Gibbons; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass; Jean G Ford Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Olga M Shuhatovich; Mathilde P Sharman; Yvette N Mirabal; Nan R Earle; Michele Follen; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2005-09-06 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Timon P H Buys; Scott B Cantor; Martial Guillaud; Karen Adler-Storthz; Dennis D Cox; Clement Okolo; Oyedunni Arulogon; Oladimeji Oladepo; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; José-Miguel Yamal; J Robert Beck; Michael E Scheurer; Dirk van Niekerk; Anais Malpica; Jasenka Matisic; Gregg Staerkel; Edward Neely Atkinson; Luc Bidaut; Pierre Lane; J Lou Benedet; Dianne Miller; Tom Ehlen; Roderick Price; Isaac F Adewole; Calum MacAulay; Michele Follen Journal: Gend Med Date: 2011-09-22
Authors: Sara H Olson; Tracy M Layne; Jennifer A Simon; Emmy Ludwig; Eileen O'Reilly; Peter J Allen; Robert C Kurtz Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Scott B Cantor; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Martial Guillaud; Dennis D Cox; E Neely Atkinson; John L Benedet; Dianne Miller; Thomas Ehlen; Jasenka Matisic; Dirk van Niekerk; Monique Bertrand; Andrea Milbourne; Helen Rhodes; Anais Malpica; Gregg Staerkel; Shahla Nader-Eftekhari; Karen Adler-Storthz; Michael E Scheurer; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; Loyd A West; Anne-Therese Vlastos; Xia Tao; J Robert Beck; Calum Macaulay; Michele Follen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Michael E Scheurer; Karen Adler-Storthz; J L Benedet; J Robert Beck; Michele Follen; Scott B Cantor Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.254