Literature DB >> 1616553

Technology assessment in medicine.

B Littenberg1.   

Abstract

The author defines the concepts medical technology and technology assessment and presents a paradigm for the evaluation of medical technologies. He proposes a hierarchical assessment scheme in which level I, biologic plausibility, compares the technology's proposed mode of action with current biologic information and theory. Level II, technical feasibility, determines whether the technology can be delivered to the target population. Level III, intermediate outcomes, assesses whether the technology has a short-term impact on the biologic or physiologic process that is diseased. Level IV, patient outcomes, investigates the overall medical, psychologic, and financial impacts of the technology upon the patient, including unintended side effects and long-term morbidity and mortality. Level V, societal outcomes, measures the cost of the technology to society in terms of resource use, ethical issues, and social and political hazards. As an example, the author employs this scheme to analyze the use of screening tests for hypercholesterolemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1616553     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199207000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Optimum investments in project evaluations: when are cost-effectiveness analyses cost-effective?

Authors:  R S Woodward; S B Boxerman; M A Schnitzler; W C Dunagan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Design and Implementation of a Pediatric ICU Acuity Scoring Tool as Clinical Decision Support.

Authors:  Eric Shelov; Naveen Muthu; Heather Wolfe; Danielle Traynor; Nancy Craig; Christopher Bonafide; Vinay Nadkarni; Daniela Davis; Maya Dewan
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Optical technologies and molecular imaging for cervical neoplasia: a program project update.

Authors:  Timon P H Buys; Scott B Cantor; Martial Guillaud; Karen Adler-Storthz; Dennis D Cox; Clement Okolo; Oyedunni Arulogon; Oladimeji Oladepo; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; José-Miguel Yamal; J Robert Beck; Michael E Scheurer; Dirk van Niekerk; Anais Malpica; Jasenka Matisic; Gregg Staerkel; Edward Neely Atkinson; Luc Bidaut; Pierre Lane; J Lou Benedet; Dianne Miller; Tom Ehlen; Roderick Price; Isaac F Adewole; Calum MacAulay; Michele Follen
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2011-09-22

4.  Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Testing a device as an adjunct to colposcopy.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Martial Guillaud; Dennis D Cox; E Neely Atkinson; John L Benedet; Dianne Miller; Thomas Ehlen; Jasenka Matisic; Dirk van Niekerk; Monique Bertrand; Andrea Milbourne; Helen Rhodes; Anais Malpica; Gregg Staerkel; Shahla Nader-Eftekhari; Karen Adler-Storthz; Michael E Scheurer; Karen Basen-Engquist; Eileen Shinn; Loyd A West; Anne-Therese Vlastos; Xia Tao; J Robert Beck; Calum Macaulay; Michele Follen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  Squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions: diagnosis and screening in a technical era.

Authors:  Catherine F Poh; Calum E MacAulay; Denise M Laronde; P Michele Williams; Lewei Zhang; Miriam P Rosin
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.589

6.  Maximizing the diversity of participants in a phase II clinical trial of optical technologies to detect cervical neoplasia.

Authors:  Bryan Pham; Nan Earle; Karen Rabel; Michele Follen; Michael E Scheurer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Technology and outcomes assessment in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Roger D Yusen
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-01-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.