Literature DB >> 17821986

The intrafraction motion induced dosimetric impacts in breast 3D radiation treatment: a 4DCT based study.

Ning J Yue1, Xiang Li, Sushil Beriwal, Dwight E Heron, Marc R Sontag, M Saiful Huq.   

Abstract

The question remains regarding the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion in 3D breast treatment. This study was conducted to investigate this issue utilizing the 4DCT scan. The 4D and helical CT scan sets were acquired for 12 breast cancer patients. For each of these patients, based on the helical CT scan, a conventional 3D conformal plan was generated. The breast treatment was then simulated based on the 4DCT scan. In each phase of the 4DCT scan, dose distribution was generated with the same beam parameters as the conventional plan. A software package was developed to compute the cumulative dose distribution from all the phases. Since the intrafraction organ motion is reflected by the 4DCT images, the cumulative dose computed based on the 4DCT images should be closer to what the patient received during treatment. Various dosimetric parameters were obtained from the plan and 4D cumulative dose distribution for the target volume and heart, and were compared to deduce the motion-induced impacts. The studies were performed for both whole breast and partial breast treatment. In the whole breast treatment, the average intrafraction motion induced changes in D95, D90, V100, V95, and V90 of the target volume were -5.4%, -3.1%, -13.4%, -5.1%, and -3.2%, respectively, with the largest values at -26.2%, -14.1%, -91.0%, -15.1%, and -9.0%, respectively. Motion had little impact on the Dmax of the target volume, but its impact on the Dmin of the target volume was significant. For left breast treatment, the motion-induced Dmax change to the heart could be negative or positive, with the largest increase at about 6 Gy. In partial breast treatment, the only non-insignificant impact was in the Dmin of the CTV (ranging from -15.2% to 11.7%). The results showed that the intrafraction motion may compromise target dose coverage in breast treatments and the degree of that compromise was correlated with motion magnitude. However, the dosimetric impact of the motion on the heart dose may be limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17821986     DOI: 10.1118/1.2739815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  The observed variance between predicted and measured radiation dose in breast and prostate patients utilizing an in vivo dosimeter.

Authors:  Charles W Scarantino; Bradley R Prestidge; Mitchel S Anscher; Carolyn R Ferree; William T Kearns; Robert D Black; Natasha G Bolick; Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Effect of breathing motion in radiotherapy of breast cancer: 4D dose calculation and motion tracking via EPID.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Reinhard Sweeney; Kurt Baier; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Improving intra-fractional target position accuracy using a 3D surface surrogate for left breast irradiation using the respiratory-gated deep-inspiration breath-hold technique.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Steve Walston; Meng Xu Welliver; Arnab Chakravarti; Allison M Quick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Feasibility of using calibrated cone-beam computed tomography scans to validate the heart dose in left breast post-mastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Bin Tang; Jiabao Ma; Jinghui Xu; Jie Li; Shengwei Kang; Pei Wang; Fan Wu; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Dosimetric comparison between three- and four-dimensional computerised tomography radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Yanli Yan; Zhou Lu; Zi Liu; Wei Luo; Shuai Shao; Li Tan; Xiaowei Ma; Jiaxin Liu; Emmanuel Kwateng Drokow; Juan Ren
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Stability and reproducibility of 6013 deep inspiration breath-holds in left-sided breast cancer.

Authors:  D Reitz; F Walter; S Schönecker; P Freislederer; M Pazos; M Niyazi; G Landry; F Alongi; E Bölke; C Matuschek; M Reiner; C Belka; S Corradini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  Target motion management in breast cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Elham Piruzan; Naser Vosoughi; Seied Rabi Mahdavi; Leila Khalafi; Hojjat Mahani
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  Characterizing Sensitive Cardiac Substructure Excursion Due to Respiration.

Authors:  Claudia R Miller; Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24

9.  Real-time intra-fraction motion management in breast cancer radiotherapy: analysis of 2028 treatment sessions.

Authors:  D Reitz; G Carl; S Schönecker; M Pazos; P Freislederer; M Niyazi; U Ganswindt; F Alongi; M Reiner; C Belka; S Corradini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.